Re: Why do folders have the read-only attribute?
- From: "Lew" <lew@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 13:38:32 -0400
I'm a software developer and controlling such things is important to my
work. I don't mind any hassle as long as I can get it done.
-Lew
"Curmudgeon" <krmujn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1114623042.233850.310880@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Lew wrote:
>
>> 1. Why what is the purpose of having a read - only folder?
>
> So that it can't be accidentally deleted?
>
>> 2. How do I change this behavior? I believe that it is
> interfering with
>> other processes.
>
> Intefering HOW!?
>
> Unless you're planning to delete the folder in the near future and
> changing its attribute is a real hassle, I see no reason to worry about
> this.
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why do folders have the read-only attribute?
- From: » mrtee «
- Re: Why do folders have the read-only attribute?
- From: kurttrail
- Re: Why do folders have the read-only attribute?
- From: Bob I
- Re: Why do folders have the read-only attribute?
- From: Tom Porterfield
- Re: Why do folders have the read-only attribute?
- References:
- Why do folders have the read-only attribute?
- From: Lew
- Re: Why do folders have the read-only attribute?
- From: Curmudgeon
- Why do folders have the read-only attribute?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why do folders have the read-only attribute?
- Next by Date: Re: Upgrading to Win64Pro
- Previous by thread: Re: Why do folders have the read-only attribute?
- Next by thread: Re: Why do folders have the read-only attribute?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading