Re: Post Diagnostic software Tool for Windows XP
- From: "William" <William@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 03:27:03 -0800
Hi,
Thank you for that, To me Windows 98 2nd edition appeared to work relatively
well indeed. I often feel that Microsoft should have kept this good operating
system in some respects and elaborated on it and made it better. Microsoft
had other ideas, It appeared not to be happy with the fact that it most
likely in all fairness to its abilities attract the highest skilled software
writers and programmers with its most probably best paid salaries around if
they could most likely show excellence in the field that they were employed
within and it headed off for an even bigger slice of the open market and
build an operating system that required a whole new kind of computer in the
way it installed the operating system or environment variables and in turn
how it saw and dealt with that whole breed of new software that had to be
manufactured to be compatible with this operating environment. I would have
said a very good marketing ploy that made Microsoft an even bigger giant in
the Market place than it really already was. They used excellent marketing
technique and know how to bounce the ball of the wall and watch it grow
bigger with each new bounce that it took, until I beleive the country that Mr
Bill gates resides within said we feel you are to big for your own good or
ours for that matter of fact and we will try and split you up or cut you down
to size.
I beleive that Microsoft wanted to download their operating systems at one
point because of the threat of theft, except it appeared that from the other
side of the world that fiction became fact for them as their own file servers
as i remember it being reported somewhere that they were broken into and a
lot of very highly valueable source code for a whole new breed of software
was stolen. So much for them trying to grasp the whole Market for themselves
and make us slaves to downloading in some respects to what your mail
suggests, except in the real world where we suffer real theft and we suffer.
This fat cat wanted to become even fatter. The Whole wide World said no and
if Microsoft had gone ahead with that plan it would most likely would be a
much smaller organisation now than it could ever envisage because the World
would find an equally good operating environment from somewhere else. Their
are much better Operating systems on the Market than Microsoft. The only
reason that Microsoft looks so good is because it has a bigger and better
slice of the market and to coin a phrase very well indeed which they have put
into practice for a very long time, In: "What glistens to the eye, Deceives
the Mind". and all those new operating systems are Paper Mache of producing
what first came out in Windows 95 to work and operate in a better way. What
you are getting now is no better than 95 first edition. It is just dressed up
to look different and behave differently. It is still the old DOS Environment
operating underneath with a front page that looks and is given the feel of
looking fantastic.
If you have to recover XP from the CD. You end up back down to the basics of
Dosshell as it used to run when windows 3.0 first came into the Market pace.
It has not changed. It is just Dosshell. and instead of typing Dosshell. You
type "HELP!. That is what should be written on all of their software with a
Government backed Warning of all of the Countries that it is used within or
state boundaries that it is sold across. Bill Gates and his entire team is
not building newer and better software. He is just embelishing older rubbish
and I beleive it reached its sold by date after Windows 95 and it is about
time we had a operating system that is clean cut and can virtually think for
itself. We are supposed to be in a World of Virtual Reality. Where is his
abilities or do they really lie in the fact that he can not harnass virtual
reality and put it to work for the whole of human kind rather than this DOS
and Windows rubbish. It is well past its sell by date.
The day that they try and sell their software and updates over the Internet,
That is the day that Microsoft will spell their doom and final destruction.
They are not the kind of establishment that builds an operating system that
behaves like a an Internet Virus protection organisation that has to have
updates on a continuous basis. The day they go all out for the idea of doing
that, and they are trying it already as in what appears in reality to be
taking place here bit by bit. That will be their untimely end and perharps
it is time that came about and someone else took over
"pjp" wrote:
> The problems are only going to get worse until MS reaches the point that the
> only software on your system is "stubs" that when invoked simply download
> the "current" version onto your system.
>
> I truly believe "MS/Bill"'s long-term intent is to slowly reach a state
> where your OS is little more than a shell with most apps being downloaded
> real-time as required ... at a fee for every use of course.
>
> You can slowly see this happening as the "start the scam" of justifying
> enforcing "Windows Update" etc. etc. is happening now using the excuse of
> battling online virus', spyware, trojans etc. etc. They'll increasingly
> justify more constraints and controls using this as the excuse for
> "neccessary" changes in how we use our computers. There'll be little debate
> that the real cause is their fundamental design.
>
> Given that scenario, they have no real interest in creating an OS that
> actually reliably works. This has been evident ever since Win95 (if not
> earlier) when they decided that the best design was to bundle everything
> including the kitchen sink into the OS.
>
> Any idiot should be able to see that's not in "our" best interest.
>
>
>
> "William" <William@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:2157DDA7-8B93-4B46-9335-F006CD8826EE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Other than Windows support tools as they appear to not function at the
> > point
> > that my computer hangs up. Does Microsoft have a Post Diagnostic Software
> > Tool that I can download that will give to me some clues as to what is
> > going
> > wrong. It would be also useful if the same tool would also operate after
> > window XP has booted up and fully installed itself.
> > How come service Pack two has so many problems once installed with Windows
> > XP Home Edition such as I am using on my Tulip Vision Line md Computer and
> > 252 MB RAM. I have Service Pack 2 on CD. But rather than install it from
> > CD.
> > I have installed it from the Internet. Still no change there.
> > Is Microsoft bringing out any newer OEM on CD ROM based operating system
> > that will hopefully have fewer problems than Windows XP and all the
> > service
> > packs do is make the apparent problems it appears to be suffering from
> > many
> > times worse with what appear to be no apparent remedies. You repair one
> > problem and then something else appears to go haywire
>
>
>
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Clipboard
- Next by Date: Re: second hard drive not assigned
- Previous by thread: Re: Post Diagnostic software Tool for Windows XP
- Next by thread: Re: Unicode (or a subset of it) in DOS window?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
