Re: License key for home network
From: Jupiter Jones [MVP] (jones_jupiter_at_hotnomail.com)
Date: 01/31/05
- Next message: Rock: "Re: Defrag Problem"
- Previous message: Jon Erlandson: "Re: default view as list"
- In reply to: kurttrail: "Re: License key for home network"
- Next in thread: kurttrail: "Re: License key for home network"
- Reply: kurttrail: "Re: License key for home network"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 23:55:19 -0700
You have no clue what I pay for as is obvious by your statement made
displaying your ignorance:
"Except now you don't pay for it, unless you count your sycophantic postings
of MicroFUD"
Can you tell me the relevancy of the source for my software?
It is all legal and follows the appropriate EULA, nothing more is relevant.
You already know more than is necessary and that is all is properly used and
licensed IAW the EULA BEFORE and after I became a MVP.
If you can give a legitimate reason, I will tell all you ask in detail.
But until then, it is just something you are attempting to use to blur the
facts you lack.
Otherwise you would not bring up irrelevant points.
"Blah, Blah, Blah. Attack me instead of try and disprove what I have
written. Such an old USENET trick. It really is sad!"
Why is it a trick to point out a discrepancy in what you do and what you
think other software manufactures do?
No trick but it does demonstrate how you have double standards with software
licensing, You do not dispute it...because it is the truth?
Interesting on what you agree makes you $ but what you disagree would costs
you $.
-- Jupiter Jones [MVP] http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/ "kurttrail" <dontemailme@anywhereintheknownuniverse.org> wrote in message news:uPTIcu1BFHA.2180@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > Jupiter Jones [MVP] wrote: >> "I blelieve in Fair Use. My copyrighted material is free for all >> private non-commercial use. If I find out it is being used for >> commercial purposes, then I'd sue." >> Thus you ask others to do for yourself what you also ask others to >> deny Microsoft and any other seller that has terms you do not like. >> Interesting double standard. > > LOL! What the OP wants to do is a "Fair Use" in my book, Juppy. Again, > "My copyrighted material is free for all private non-commercial use." > > Where did the OP mention that he was using the software for commercial > use? > > You are so disingenuous that you actually think I am the hypocrite! Did > you pay for the OS you are using on your own computer? > >> >> As for FUD, if you do not like FUD why do you continuously bring up >> irrelevant points such as the source for software. >> All my software is properly used and licensed now as it was before I >> was an MVP. > > Except now you don't pay for it, unless you count your sycophantic > postings of MicroFUD. > >> Of course since you lack facts to support your point, it is >> understandable your need to bring up such irrelevant points. > > Seems like I touched a nerve! Ouch! ;-) > >> Your accusations against Microsoft are more of your own FUD. > > MS is a proven predatory monopoly, and also a proven copyright and patent > infringer, while no private non-commercial individual has EVER been > legally found to have infringed or violated a EULA for installing one copy > of software on more than one computer. > > That not FUD, Just the facts, Juppy! > >> For disliking FUD, you seem to pass enough around. > > Prove what I say is FUD. > >> But then to abide by the ideas you expect of others does not fit >> Kurt's character. >> More double standards of Kurt's. > > Blah, Blah, Blah. Attack me instead of try and disprove what I have > written. Such an old USENET trick. It really is sad! > > -- > Peace! > Kurt > Self-anointed Moderator > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://xxxxxxxxxxxxx > "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron! > "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
- Next message: Rock: "Re: Defrag Problem"
- Previous message: Jon Erlandson: "Re: default view as list"
- In reply to: kurttrail: "Re: License key for home network"
- Next in thread: kurttrail: "Re: License key for home network"
- Reply: kurttrail: "Re: License key for home network"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|