Re: Too Many Fonts
From: R. McCarty (PcEngWork-NoSpam__at_mindspring.com)
Date: 01/29/05
- Next message: Alex Nichol: "Re: Windows Logon Password"
- Previous message: Rock: "Re: Lost XP Disk"
- In reply to: Mike Hall: "Re: Too Many Fonts"
- Next in thread: +++Bobby \: "Re: Too Many Fonts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 14:13:21 GMT
That sounds familiar - I think the Font limitation is another of those
Windows 3->ME carryover ideas. I've seen XP systems with allot
of Fonts installed and don't remember any issues with the total #
being very high. Best I can recollect, the number 1000 for older
versions of Windows come to mind.
"Mike Hall" <mike.hall.mail@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:eYpfitgBFHA.1296@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Was it Windows 3.1 that could only use and display 60 or so fonts at any
> one time?.. I don't remember as clearly these days..
>
> --
> Mike Hall
> MVP - Windows Shell/user
>
> http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
>
>
>
>
>
> "Miss Perspicacia Tick" <misstick@lancre.dw> wrote in message
> news:y%KKd.7562$OL.3806@fe48.usenetserver.com...
>> Mike Hall wrote:
>>> I have 419..
>>
>> I wasn't boasting - I was making a point that you can have thousands
>> installed and it won't make one iota of difference to performance. It
>> just proves I'm too lazy to remove fonts when I've finished a job! ;o)
>>
>>
>> --
>> Facon - the artificial bacon bits you get in Pizza Hut for sprinkling
>> on salads.
>>
>>
>
>
- Next message: Alex Nichol: "Re: Windows Logon Password"
- Previous message: Rock: "Re: Lost XP Disk"
- In reply to: Mike Hall: "Re: Too Many Fonts"
- Next in thread: +++Bobby \: "Re: Too Many Fonts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
