Re: MS and security: good effort but no cigar
From: Sam (g_reate_xcalibur_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 02/24/05
- Next message: Dan: "Re: What's wrong with Microsoft"
- Previous message: Al Dykes: "Re: NT or 9x which source code is superior (???)"
- In reply to: Dan: "Re: MS and security: good effort but no cigar"
- Next in thread: Dan: "Re: MS and security: good effort but no cigar"
- Reply: Dan: "Re: MS and security: good effort but no cigar"
- Reply: Sharon F: "Re: MS and security: good effort but no cigar"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:27:43 -0500
Apparently, _Dan_, on 24/02/05 12:22,typed:
> True, Sam but I am happy with 98SE and XPPRO in my dual-boot with a
> customized boot environment. Linux, Unix, Apple are all good alternatives
> but one must remember they do not have the market share as of yet. Maybe
> someday in the future these companies will be able to challenge Microsoft
> thus leading to more computer innovation and more technology for the world
> and helping keep the States as a superpower. You can tell I am a techie.
> <smile>
This is probably off topic now: IIRC, Windows used to insist on being
installed on C: drive and wouldn't install on any other. However, I have
seen Linux being installable on any hard drive's any paritition and
happily live there.
Are there any restrictions where I can install XP on a given hard disk?
Sam.
-- Please remove the underscores ( the '_' symbols) from my email address to obtain the correct one. Apologies, but the fudging is to remove spam.
- Next message: Dan: "Re: What's wrong with Microsoft"
- Previous message: Al Dykes: "Re: NT or 9x which source code is superior (???)"
- In reply to: Dan: "Re: MS and security: good effort but no cigar"
- Next in thread: Dan: "Re: MS and security: good effort but no cigar"
- Reply: Dan: "Re: MS and security: good effort but no cigar"
- Reply: Sharon F: "Re: MS and security: good effort but no cigar"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
