Re: Multiple Versions at Boot

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

From: Ron Sommer (rsommer_at_nospam.ktis.net)
Date: 02/16/05 

Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:55:05 -0600

Hi,
I have XP Home and I don't have Performance and Maintenance.
I also don't have bootcfg available from a cmd prompt.

I tried contacting Microsoft. I get
This Service is Currently Not Available 

-- 
Ron Sommer
"R. C. White" <rc@corridor.net> wrote in message 
news:u0ek6H9EFHA.624@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Hi, Ron.
>
> Yes, I see what you mean.  I'll try to get the attention of the MSFT folks 
> who maintain the KB.  Not only is this specific line wrong, but there are 
> a few other parts of the article that need to be cleaned up.  Like, for 
> instance, MY control panel does not have a "Performance and Maintenance" 
> tool; does yours?  And the article implies that it is a simple matter to 
> add Win2K to an existing WinXP installation; in my experience, it's not 
> simple at all, because when Win2K Setup spots WinXP's version of NTLDR and 
> NTDETECT.COM, it refuses to install Win2K.  (But I haven't tried to 
> reinstall Win2K in years, so maybe my memory about this is not correct.)
>
> Of course, you (and any other user) can also comment by using the feedback 
> section at the bottom of the article.
>
> If I get a response to my request for a change in KB 289022, I'll try to 
> remember to come back here and update this thread.
>
> In the meantime, any reader who refers to KB article 289022 should note 
> the error.  The "disk(1)" in this line in the "after" version of the 
> sample boot.ini file is wrong:
> multi(0)disk(1)rdisk(0)partition(1)\WINDOWS="Windows XP Professional" 
> /fastdetect
>
> It should say:
> multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(1)\WINDOWS="Windows XP Professional" 
> /fastdetect
>
> The computer probably would not boot until the error is corrected.  :>(
>
> Thanks for pointing that out, Ron.
>
> RC
> -- 
> R. C. White, CPA
> San Marcos, TX
> rc@corridor.net
> Microsoft Windows MVP
>
> "Ron Sommer" <rsommer@nospam.ktis.net> wrote in message 
> news:%23HcOa61EFHA.3244@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>> RC,
>> This Knowledge Base article has a similar error to the one Sam had.
>> http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q289/0/22.asp
>> The disk value changed from 0 to 1 for the original system and the 
>> default system doesn't match any of the operating systems because of the 
>> disk value change.
>> Do you know how to contact Microsoft to get the article fixed?
>> -- 
>> Ron Sommer
>>
>> "R. C. White" <rc@corridor.net> wrote in message 
>> news:%23ciVfvxEFHA.1084@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>>> Hi, Sam.
>>>
>>> Yes, as Ron Sommer said, and as the computer gods have decreed (Who 
>>> knows why?), counting of your hard drives begins with zero.  But 
>>> counting the partitions starts with one on each hard drive.  (Some other 
>>> time we'll discuss rdisk() and why partitions() includes logical drives 
>>> in the extended partition.)
>>>
>>> In boot.ini, the bottom portion, under [operating systems], should list 
>>> all the Microsoft operating systems that you have installed, with one 
>>> line each. You can have only a single MS-DOS or Win9x/ME installation 
>>> (referred to with the C:\="Microsoft Windows 98" kind of line), plus one 
>>> or more instances of WinNT4, Win2K, WinXP and perhaps others (Windows 
>>> 2003 Server, Longhorn, etc.), mix and match.  The Default line in the 
>>> top portion, under [Boot Loader], should echo one of those operating 
>>> system lines.  My first reply correctly showed rdisk(0), but your next 
>>> post showed rdisk(1) - which didn't work.
>>>
>>> If you'd like to understand more about the Boot.ini file, you might like 
>>> to read this part of the online version of the Windows XP Professional 
>>> Resource Kit:
>>> Reviewing and Correcting Boot.ini Settings on x86-based Systems
>>> http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/Windows/XP/all/reskit/en-us/Default.asp?url=/resources/documentation/Windows/XP/all/reskit/en-us/prmc_str_masc.asp
>>>
>>> Sometimes these URLS don't land on exactly the page I have in mind.  If 
>>> you get lost, it's in Chapter 28 of the RK.
>>>
>>> RC
>>> -- 
>>> R. C. White, CPA
>>> San Marcos, TX
>>> rc@corridor.net
>>> Microsoft Windows MVP
>>>
>>
>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Current status of Ada?
    ... operating systems which had been created before DOS. ... Microsoft Windows 98 will not run on Microsoft NT 3.51, ... compatibility in Linux than in the closed source world. ... someone who is competent at maintaining an installation, ...
    (comp.lang.ada)
  • Re: SBS 2003, lost companyweb
    ... Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support ... This newsgroup only focuses on SBS technical issues. ... The original Windows SBS installation was preinstalled by an OEM. ... Important You must change this registry entry on all domain controllers. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: David Faber Report : Putting 2 and 2 together
    ... Without significant exception, all OEMs pre-install Windows on the vast majority of PCs that they sell, and they uniformly are of a mind that there exists no commercially viable alternative to which they could switch in response to a substantial and sustained price increase or its equivalent by Microsoft. ... The accuracy of this belief is highlighted by the fact that the other vendors of Intel-compatible PC operating systems do not view their own offerings as viable alternatives to Windows. ...
    (misc.invest.stocks)
  • Re: needs automated clean-up tool [Re: Office 2007 beta uninstall]
    ... for both us and the customers. ... to get rid of every trace of Office 2007 beta, but that wastes a great deal ... We really have to wonder if any of those representing the Microsoft line on ... Why is it so hard to understand that we expect the Microsoft installation ...
    (microsoft.public.office.setup)
  • RE: Fatal Error Installing XPsv2 Deployment for SBS sv1 Upgrade
    ... 825763 How to configure Internet access in Windows Small Business Server ... Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support ... >> 325.547: Fatal error during installation. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)