Re: Windows xp home
From: Dan (spamyou_at_user.nec)
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 00:19:22 -0700
So with 98SE all beefed up in security with third party products, then you
still think XP (NT code based) is more secure, Ron?
"Ron Martell" <email@example.com> wrote in message
: "Dan" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
: >I know that 98SE is more secure since it is based on 9x source code and is
: >now mostly ignored by hackers since they are mainly targetting XP PRO. and
: >have the NT source code in their sites. 98, 98SE and even ME (I do not
: >Millenium) all are based on 9x which has its roots in MS-DOS and NT does
: >have a true maintenance operating system and Microsoft needs to have a
: >seperate NT underlying maintenance operating system and not rely on an
: >emulator of MS-DOS since MS-DOS's true successor was the 9x source code
: >reached the height of its glory with 98 Second Edition and unfortunately
: >Microsoft rushed out Millenium and so it was flawed and I am really glad
: >Microsoft is taking their time with Longhorn and I hope it is awesome.
: Windows 98 is in no way *more* secure than Windows XP. It may give
: you a false sense of security because not so many scumbags are
: targetting it these days but it is still highly vulnerable and just as
: soon as Windows XP gets a bit tougher to penetrate you could see
: renewed assaults aimed at the 9x products.
: Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada
: Microsoft MVP
: On-Line Help Computer Service
: "The reason computer chips are so small is computers don't eat much."