Re: Hyper threading - BIG WHITE ELEPHANT ?

From: Admiral Q (Star_Fleet_Admiral_Q(NOSPAM)_at_(SPAMNOT)hotmail.com)
Date: 01/12/05


Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 21:20:23 -0500

A lot depends on how the program wrote the program - many programs used by
the "General Public" have not be refitted to use Hyperthreading - i.e. more
than one processor simultaneously. At present only your high grade
software, such as CAD, engineering or mathematical applications are geared
towards more than one processor on a Workstation - much less you day-to-day
role playing game being written to handle hyperthreading.
Jump to your AMD processor, won't make much difference - if the software
wasn't designed to take advantage of it, it won't do much good. Corporate
America wants the biggest bang for the smallest buck, writing a rootem
tootem role playing game to run on a single processor system is that ticket,
cause if it runs on a single processor, it'll run on a hyperthreading system
or a multiprocessor system. And it cuts into the profits to write 3
versions of the same software, when the later runs on all 3.

-- 
Star Fleet Admiral Q @ your service!
"AlexJHill" <AlexJHill@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:839AAF62-0719-41B4-ADC2-E26D9F761906@microsoft.com...
> Hey i wanted to know if anyone out there has noticed much difference with
> hyperthreading on or off?
>
>  i mean xp pro is designed for 2 processors thats great but HT surely
doesnt
> split the cache in half so while 1 "processor" is being hammered the other
> seems to have no or little load so to me i think HT is a big white
elephant
> Intel brought out. should have gotten the FX AMD chip.. why oh why did i
> leave AMD for Intel!
>
> i think this should be the same for games as not many programs are written
> for dual processors..... so i'd be kind of effectivley using 2GHz of my 4
Ghz
> prescott :(
>
>
> ANy comments welcome!


Relevant Pages

  • Re: Box restarting with Windows XP & Hyperthreading
    ... I agree that there has been some progress with HT, but with AMD and Intel ... migrating to Hypertransport for the x86, I see little potential for further ... Hyperthreading, x86 64 bit processing, etc). ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)
  • Re: Amd ^4
    ... > and this amd dosn't does that mean something is worng or it just shows as ... It's not at all the same as Intel's "HyperThreading", ... reality is that it doesn't really produce that much extra performance in ... chips in the not too distant future. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: freebsd-performance Digest, Vol 3, Issue 11
    ... > As far as i know HyperThreading is an Intel trademark and technologie as ... > feature supported by FreeBSD for AMD processors. ... like HyperThreading in its CPU's -- not even in K8. ... HyperThreaded CPU, others don't. ...
    (freebsd-performance)
  • Re: ACPI and kernel 2.6.9-1.6.FC2
    ... I'm using an all AMD system....don't know if ht means ... hyperthreading on. ... and the kernel ... ... T o m M i t c h e l l spam unwanted email. ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: RCU+SMR
    ... With all the pushing for SMP, dual-core, multi-core, (and the abomination known as "hyperthreading", you would think some of the big names (like Intel and AMD) would be pushing for ways to get the most out of new processor features and parallelism without everyone having to roll their own. ... They also have a view on ROI that's hardware rather than software oriented. ... adds overhead. ...
    (comp.programming.threads)