NTFS vs FAT32 for Specific Application
From: LinusF (LinusF_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 01/25/05
- Next message: Imanuker: "Address Bar and web pages"
- Previous message: Tom: "Font colour"
- Next in thread: Steve N.: "Re: NTFS vs FAT32 for Specific Application"
- Reply: Steve N.: "Re: NTFS vs FAT32 for Specific Application"
- Reply: Tim Slattery: "Re: NTFS vs FAT32 for Specific Application"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:57:05 -0800
I have an external 250GB hard drive which will be used almost solely to hold
images. PSD, TIF, JPG, GIF in that order of frequency. Sizes will range
from 2GB (a very few), 8-15 MB maybe 10%, 3-6 MB (maybe 40%), 1-3 MB (maybe
30%), smaller (all the rest.
An unknown percentage of the HD will temporarily hold backups from the fixed
drives.
Question: which system should provide more space/speed/whatever? I use
WinXP Pro on both machines this HD will attach to.
Thanks
- Next message: Imanuker: "Address Bar and web pages"
- Previous message: Tom: "Font colour"
- Next in thread: Steve N.: "Re: NTFS vs FAT32 for Specific Application"
- Reply: Steve N.: "Re: NTFS vs FAT32 for Specific Application"
- Reply: Tim Slattery: "Re: NTFS vs FAT32 for Specific Application"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|