Re: Pirated XP, means-test everyone and every product with "income
From: Linda B (someone_at_microsoft.com)
Date: 01/25/05
- Next message: Lanny Bender: "Default Users"
- Previous message: lbrty4us_at_aol.com: "Re: Are there advantages of Linux over XP Pro.?"
- In reply to: XS11E: "Re: Pirated XP, means-test everyone and every product with "income"
- Next in thread: XS11E: "Re: Pirated XP, means-test everyone and every product with "income"
- Reply: XS11E: "Re: Pirated XP, means-test everyone and every product with "income"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 16:44:45 -0800
See my earlier posts if you require explanation. Or don't; I certainly
don't care.
"XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95E8B28D26E02xs11eyahoocom@207.46.248.16...
> "Linda B" <someone@microsoft.com> wrote in
> news:#XtuvNnAFHA.2572@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl:
>
> > Alias, you are needlessly confrontational, but you have a good
> > point -- buying one copy of the OS and installing it on all five
> > of my hypothetical computers at home is doing Microsoft no harm
> > whatsoever.
>
> If you bought the required five copies, they'd sell four copies more.
> How do you figure you've done them "no harm whatsoever"? You've stolen
> an amount of money equal to the price of those four copies, if you can
> justify that in your own mind fine but you'd still be a thief.
>
>
>
>
>
- Next message: Lanny Bender: "Default Users"
- Previous message: lbrty4us_at_aol.com: "Re: Are there advantages of Linux over XP Pro.?"
- In reply to: XS11E: "Re: Pirated XP, means-test everyone and every product with "income"
- Next in thread: XS11E: "Re: Pirated XP, means-test everyone and every product with "income"
- Reply: XS11E: "Re: Pirated XP, means-test everyone and every product with "income"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
