Re: pagefile FAT32 or NTFS
From: Rick \ (rick_at_mvps.org)
Date: 01/02/05
- Next message: Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]: "Re: XP Pro Bug"
- Previous message: Al Dykes: "Re: pagefile FAT32 or NTFS"
- In reply to: Larry(LJL269): "pagefile FAT32 or NTFS"
- Next in thread: Ken Blake: "Re: pagefile FAT32 or NTFS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 12:25:36 -0500
Hi,
No gotcha's - use FAT32 as performance may be marginally better with the
small drive.
-- Best of Luck, Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/ Associate Expert - WindowsXP Expert Zone www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone Windows help - www.rickrogers.org "Larry(LJL269)" <NO@EMAIL.COM> wrote in message news:o97gt01ktb1kg14a707juo6vpjdp0b7fan@4ax.com... >I have the luxury of putting my pagefile on a 1GB drive > all by itself. I can format that in either FAT32 or > NTFS. This will be my first NTFS partition and I'm not > sure if the advantages of NTFS are applicable to the > pagefile. > > Any Catch-22's or Gotcha's? > > Comments/suggestions/corrections appreciated. > Thanks- bye- Larry > > Any advise is my attempt to contribute more than I have received but I can > only assure you that it works on my PC. GOOD LUCK.
- Next message: Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]: "Re: XP Pro Bug"
- Previous message: Al Dykes: "Re: pagefile FAT32 or NTFS"
- In reply to: Larry(LJL269): "pagefile FAT32 or NTFS"
- Next in thread: Ken Blake: "Re: pagefile FAT32 or NTFS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
