Re: Keeping the swapfile in a separate partition

From: SlowJet (SlowJet_at_noTY2this.com)
Date: 12/27/04 

Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 22:14:02 GMT

Good Grief, Charlie Geeks. :)

I just purchased a 120 GB HD for 33 cents a GB.
You guys are debating wheater to use 10, 15 or 25 cents worth of disk space
for the page file. lol

Make it 1.5X the RAM and be done with it. The world has bigger issues, and
so does XP, MAC X, Linux, and even your Mr. Coffee machine!

SJ

"Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message
news:MPG.1c38a409305bed00989d7e@news-server.columbus.rr.com...
> In article <ul8ts05r5utkgcv8d170amgo0bkh36rcp3@4ax.com>,
> alexn.mvpdts@ntlworld.delete.com says...
>> alegator wrote:
>>
>> >Thanks everyone for their answers. I currently have 2Gb of RAM and have
>> >the
>> >paging file assigned to a MAX and MIN values of 4096MB. Is this fine?.
>>
>> Very wasteful of disk space. You will hardly be using the file at all,
>> other than as a place to assign pages not yet brought into use after
>> programs have asked for the allocation (and many ask for much more than
>> they need). I would set initial 100 and max maybe 1000 to cover that
>> point. The idea that page file should be a multiple of RAM - *any*
>> multiple - is plain wrong and makes no sense at all in a single user
>> system like windows. It is an old rule of thumb from Multi-user Unix,
>> where it did make sense
>
> I run a computer in a single user environment and edit large graphics
> files all the time. When the swap file is set to vary between X & Y the
> computer takes ages to INCREASE from X to Y. With the swap file setup on
> another physical drive, and set to 2 X RAM, it made a LARGE difference
> in performance. With 2GB of RAM, the swap, on a single drive system,
> should be set to about 1GB fixed size, in an unfragmented space, to
> allow for anticipated use of the swap area - if the user is running
> memory intensive apps (which 2g of RAM might indicate), then a 2gb or
> 4gb fixed size swap area might be reasonable.
>
> My news reader will use 1GB of ram from time to time, it's amazing at
> how much RAM non-business apps can use.
>
> --
> --
> spamfree999@rrohio.com
> (Remove 999 to reply to me)

Relevant Pages

  • Re: running Linux with no swap space (but lots of RAM)
    ... |>| It's a statement of fact: You are advocating to save disk space at the ... |>| expense of RAM. ... what would have to be running to make use of 256 GB of swap? ... |>A page that is dirty and would get swapped out can instead take up RAM ...
    (comp.os.linux.development.system)
  • Re: Keeping the swapfile in a separate partition
    ... > Very wasteful of disk space. ... I run a computer in a single user environment and edit large graphics ... When the swap file is set to vary between X & Y the ... With 2GB of RAM, the swap, on a single drive system, ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: running Linux with no swap space (but lots of RAM)
    ... |>> to dirty, but inactive pages associated with some applications. ... | It's a statement of fact: You are advocating to save disk space at the ... | expense of RAM. ... what would have to be running to make use of 256 GB of swap? ...
    (comp.os.linux.development.system)
  • Re: Keeping the swapfile in a separate partition
    ... >> Very wasteful of disk space. ... When the swap file is set to vary between X & Y the ... With 2GB of RAM, the swap, on a single drive system, ... > 4gb fixed size swap area might be reasonable. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: excessive swap-in time
    ... Trying to do it all with RAM is just inefficient. ... I find that does not work well when the swapping is caused by excessive I/O ... Or you could have 5 TB of swap space. ...
    (comp.os.linux.development.system)
Loading