Re: Mcafee Mystery Entries in the Registry?
From: Malke (malke_at_nospoonnotreally.com)
Date: 12/22/04
- Next message: Ron Martell: "Re: Several words on File Fragmentation and performance"
- Previous message: David H. Lipman: "Re: Several words on File Fragmentation and performance"
- In reply to: W. Watson: "Re: Mcafee Mystery Entries in the Registry?"
- Next in thread: W. Watson: "Re: Mcafee Mystery Entries in the Registry?"
- Reply: W. Watson: "Re: Mcafee Mystery Entries in the Registry?"
- Reply: W. Watson: "Re: Mcafee Mystery Entries in the Registry?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 13:58:48 -0800
W. Watson wrote:
>
> The reason I'm concerned about this is that I did not like the way the
> uninstall of Mcafee Firewall went. By that I mean, when I dealt with
> their tech support (chat), they misunderstood that I did not want it
> removed, and before I knew it, I was on the road to removal. I prefer
> to the McAfee firewall over the MS firewall, and want to make sure
> that if I install McAfee again that it doesn't lead to trouble. I'm
> just checking all the bases before getting stuck with yet one more
> problem.
I personally dislike all the Mcafee software. It's bloated, causes
conflicts, and as you found out, uninstalling it is a bear. For Windows
firewalls, I like the free Sygate, Kerio, or even ZoneAlarm (although
ZA is also hideous to uninstall).
>
> Perhaps you didn't notice my final post on the SP2 problem resolution.
> It ended several days ago when I decided to call their tech support
> for help, I found that SP2 troubleshooting and correction was *free*.
> It took 2 hours on the phone to get the problem resolved. In the end,
> this appeared to be very much an MS SP2 problem. However, it's over
> and my XP machine is performing as it should. My three computers can
> ping away to my heart's content and XP knows about its own local
> network connections. BTW, did you know that MS tech support is $245
> per (advanced--whatever that means) incident on XP Pro?
Actually, support just depends on what product you bought. When I bought
Win2k Pro years ago it came with two free support incidents. I have
paid the $245 when I needed help with a client's Win2k Server problem
and thought it was well worth it - a cost of doing business. It would
have been far more expensive *not* to call. I'm glad the SP2 support
worked for you.
>
> Caught up with dealing problems with Linux/MS software is an
> understatement. :-) My brain is reeling from the number of
> difficulties I've had trying to get these three computers networked in
> the last 4-5 weeks. I'll spare you. I'm finally at a stage where I can
> work on Samba, and even this *supposedly* simple challenge is fraught
> with glitches.
Samba is easy, particularly if your distro has a configuration gui (like
SuSE's YaST). Otherwise, either try SWAT or even Webmin as nice gui's,
but don't forget to actually look at the resulting smb.conf file,
usually found in /etc. For a small network like yours, there should be
no problem with Samba. Do some reading at www.samba.org and use Google
Groups to review past postings on the Samba newsgroups.
Normally, I do not discuss Linux in the Windows groups since it is
really OT, but because you've had such a hard time, here is my smb.conf
file from my desktop (SuSE 9.1 Pro) which may help you. Any further
Samba/Linux discussion should be done in the appropriate newsgroups.
[global]
workgroup = AVALON
printing = cups
printcap name = cups
printcap cache time = 750
cups options = raw
printer admin = @ntadmin, root, administrator
username map = /etc/samba/smbusers
map to guest = Bad User
logon path = \\%L\profiles\.msprofile
logon drive = P:
logon home = \\%L\%U\.9xprofile
security = user
encrypt passwords = yes
passdb backend = smbpasswd
server string = Samba Server
netbios name = taliesin
add machine script =
domain logons = no
local master = no
preferred master = auto
ldap suffix = dc=example,dc=com
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
valid users = %S
browseable = no
read only = No
inherit permissions = Yes
guest ok = no
printable = no
[profiles]
comment = Network Profiles Service
path = %H
read only = No
store dos attributes = Yes
create mask = 0600
directory mask = 0700
browseable = yes
guest ok = no
printable = no
[users]
comment = All users
path = /home
read only = No
inherit permissions = Yes
veto files = /aquota.user/groups/shares/
browseable = yes
guest ok = no
printable = no
[groups]
comment = All groups
path = /home/groups
read only = No
inherit permissions = Yes
browseable = yes
guest ok = no
printable = no
[pdf]
comment = PDF creator
path = /var/tmp
printable = yes
print command = /usr/bin/smbprngenpdf -J '%J' -c %c -s %s -u '%u' -z
%z
create mask = 0600
browseable = yes
guest ok = no
[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/tmp
printable = yes
create mask = 0600
browseable = no
guest ok = no
[print$]
comment = Printer Drivers
path = /var/lib/samba/drivers
write list = @ntadmin root
force group = ntadmin
create mask = 0664
directory mask = 0775
browseable = yes
guest ok = no
printable = no
Good luck,
Malke
-- MS MVP - Windows Shell/User Elephant Boy Computers www.elephantboycomputers.com "Don't Panic!"
- Next message: Ron Martell: "Re: Several words on File Fragmentation and performance"
- Previous message: David H. Lipman: "Re: Several words on File Fragmentation and performance"
- In reply to: W. Watson: "Re: Mcafee Mystery Entries in the Registry?"
- Next in thread: W. Watson: "Re: Mcafee Mystery Entries in the Registry?"
- Reply: W. Watson: "Re: Mcafee Mystery Entries in the Registry?"
- Reply: W. Watson: "Re: Mcafee Mystery Entries in the Registry?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|