Re: XP and XP2?
From: Ramesh [MVP] (ramesh_at_nojunkmails.com@mvps.org)
Date: 11/29/04
- Next message: Tor Arne: "Accessing local NTFS partitions without assigning driveletter?"
- Previous message: Carey Frisch [MVP]: "Re: XP and XP2?"
- In reply to: cates2: "XP and XP2?"
- Next in thread: Rene: "Re: XP and XP2?"
- Reply: Rene: "Re: XP and XP2?"
- Reply: Richard Urban: "Re: XP and XP2?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 21:29:03 +0530
>> also have question out to HP but their response is slowwww.
Wondering what happened to their "Rapid-response" e-mail team?
-- Ramesh, Microsoft MVP Windows XP Shell/User http://windowsxp.mvps.org "cates2" <cates2@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:6646F79F-C5FC-451A-B716-D64A7B4DA2BA@microsoft.com... I've read the posts about SP2 being cumulative, so that you don't need SP1. 1) My PC manufacturer (HP) has a couple updates that are supposed to be installed on a PC with XP and SP1 (Per HP, "These updates are to be applied to PCs with Microsoft Windows XP SP1 installed.") . Since these are not Microsoft updates, they would not be in SP2. So, in this situation I would need to install SP1 first? (also have question out to HP but their response is slowwww.) 2) HP states that SP2 may not install properly without SP 1 already installed. Is this "true"? 3) What is SP 1a?
- Next message: Tor Arne: "Accessing local NTFS partitions without assigning driveletter?"
- Previous message: Carey Frisch [MVP]: "Re: XP and XP2?"
- In reply to: cates2: "XP and XP2?"
- Next in thread: Rene: "Re: XP and XP2?"
- Reply: Rene: "Re: XP and XP2?"
- Reply: Richard Urban: "Re: XP and XP2?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
