Re: Pro v Home-encryption?
From: Rick \ (rick_at_mvps.org)
Date: 11/22/04
- Next message: Alex Nichol: "Re: Upgrade from XP home to XP Professional?"
- Previous message: Ron Bogart: "Re: Looking for the cause of this...."
- In reply to: David H. Lipman: "Re: Pro v Home-encryption?"
- Next in thread: David H. Lipman: "Re: Pro v Home-encryption?"
- Reply: David H. Lipman: "Re: Pro v Home-encryption?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 06:47:01 -0500
I don't know if I would use the term "dominate", as if that were the case
they would want to put it in all versions of XP, not just Pro - and release
a compatible version for other Win-OS's. Right now you must be accessing a
Pro or Server2003 system to use this feature, though you can download a file
that will allow you to access the machine from any version of Win. But it
doesn't work in reverse.
I have never tried ReachOut, have you used it and what do you think of it?
Am curious.
-- Best of Luck, Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/ Associate Expert - WindowsXP Expert Zone www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone Windows help - www.rickrogers.org "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message news:OgOrYVD0EHA.1392@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... > Remote desktop -- Just another example of a third party product that > Microsoft wants to > takeover and dominate. ReachOut and PC AnyWhere are just two of the many > Remote Control > software. > > Dave > > > > "AmericanTechie" <AmericanTechie@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in > message > news:B8FD577B-5AFC-446A-B539-377CADF726B9@microsoft.com... > | Keep in mind that some of the more advanced features allowed by Pro also > | requires an advanced knowledge of the operating system. Playing with > | functions such as EFS can get you into trouble (file loss) if you don't > know > | how to use it. This becomes critical when dealing with company files. > The > | bottom line is you can't go wrong with purchasing the Pro edition, but > many > | of the extra feautures would probably not be used in this case. I do > find it > | very helpful to be able to use remote desktop which is a pro feature. > | > | Thanks, > | > | John > | http://www.americantechie.com > | > | "David H. Lipman" wrote: > | > | > Thank you for that clarification Rick. > | > > | > Dave > | > > | > > | > > | > "Rick "Nutcase" Rogers" <rick@mvps.org> wrote in message > | > news:ukwwGTC0EHA.2012@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... > | > | Um, no, NTFS, and the resultant permissions, is available and > configurable > | > | on both versions. Only difference is that on Home systems you have > to access > | > | the security settings in Safe mode. Both versions can use NTFS with > equal > | > | alacrity. EFS itself is only available on XP Pro, and is reliant on > the NTFS > | > | file system, but they are two different things. However, regardless > of > | > | version, NTFS security can be overridden by sloppy system security > (lack of > | > | firewall, improper port settings, etc.). > | > | > | > | -- > | > | Best of Luck, > | > | > | > | Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP > | > | http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/ > | > | Associate Expert - WindowsXP Expert Zone > | > | www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone > | > | Windows help - www.rickrogers.org > | > | > | > | "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message > | > | news:eBXb7MC0EHA.2568@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > | > | > But he would also gain NTFS security via XP pro as compared with > XPHE. > | > | > > | > | > Dave > | > > | > > | > > >
- Next message: Alex Nichol: "Re: Upgrade from XP home to XP Professional?"
- Previous message: Ron Bogart: "Re: Looking for the cause of this...."
- In reply to: David H. Lipman: "Re: Pro v Home-encryption?"
- Next in thread: David H. Lipman: "Re: Pro v Home-encryption?"
- Reply: David H. Lipman: "Re: Pro v Home-encryption?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|