Re: Ram Drive
From: Alex Nichol (alexn.mvpdts_at_ntlworld.delete.com)
Date: 11/20/04
- Next message: Bill Crocker: "Re: SP2 & Norton AntiVirus"
- Previous message: Bill Crocker: "Re: I386 folder"
- In reply to: Gareth Tuckwell: "Re: Ram Drive"
- Next in thread: Gareth Tuckwell: "Re: Ram Drive"
- Reply: Gareth Tuckwell: "Re: Ram Drive"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 11:28:49 +0000
Gareth Tuckwell wrote:
>
>More than the 2GB I already have?? And I am talking about 600MB of temporary
>files being used over a 10-15 minute period - I know a little bit of OS
>cache doesn't store that all in memory - I can hear the hard disk thrashing
>away during the build!!
In XP yes it does, provided there is no other more important use around
(which is unlikely). But if you have a RAM drive it will just insert
its cache in between that and your program, thus using RAM twice over.
-- Alex Nichol MS MVP (Windows Technologies) Bournemouth, U.K. Alexn@mvps.D8E8L.org (remove the D8 bit)
- Next message: Bill Crocker: "Re: SP2 & Norton AntiVirus"
- Previous message: Bill Crocker: "Re: I386 folder"
- In reply to: Gareth Tuckwell: "Re: Ram Drive"
- Next in thread: Gareth Tuckwell: "Re: Ram Drive"
- Reply: Gareth Tuckwell: "Re: Ram Drive"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|