Re: Differences between Windows Xp professional and Windos Xp Media Ce
From: Mike Brannigan [MSFT] (mikebran_at_online.microsoft.com)
Date: 10/28/04
- Next message: Phil: "Re: Back to original questions"
- Previous message: Wesley Vogel: "Re: Safe mode and MSConfig"
- In reply to: David Candy: "Re: Differences between Windows Xp professional and Windos Xp Media Ce"
- Next in thread: David Candy: "Re: Differences between Windows Xp professional and Windos Xp Media Ce"
- Reply: David Candy: "Re: Differences between Windows Xp professional and Windos Xp Media Ce"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 19:26:12 +0100
"David Candy" <david@mvps.org> wrote in message
news:OHLXcaRvEHA.3376@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Well I have reported piracy of Win 2000 Server and workstations
> but MS don't care (anything under $100,000 I think).
> And it was you (MS) that I was accusing.
> And I did not read anything on that page that said it was supplied
> with hardware. There was a disclaimer on it but no signs of hardware.
> Does MS advise that all retail/upgrade consumers buy OEM and save money.
David,
Please provide details of where you think we (Microsoft) has engaged in
fraudulent activity in regard to this matter.
I cannot speak for eBuyer but I recently purchased a part that was OEM only
from another supplier and during the purchase process on the web site I was
required to purchase a appropriate additional hardware component to comply
with the OEM licensing I was operating under for the part I was purchasing
initially.
Microsoft offers our Windows opertaing system for general retail sale or
purchase preinstalled by OEMs. There is also a market in existence that
supplies Microsoft OEM products with non peripheral hardware as part of the
purchase
End users/customer should choose whichever purchasing options best meets
there requirements given the differences that exist between all the options
in a number of areas - examples being (but not limited to) support and
license usage rights (OEM one time use vs. Retail may be moved) etc.
-- Regards, Mike -- Mike Brannigan [Microsoft] This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights Please note I cannot respond to e-mailed questions, please use these newsgroups "David Candy" <david@mvps.org> wrote in message news:OHLXcaRvEHA.3376@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Well I have reported piracy of Win 2000 Server and workstations but MS don't care (anything under $100,000 I think). And it was you (MS) that I was accusing. And I did not read anything on that page that said it was supplied with hardware. There was a disclaimer on it but no signs of hardware. Does MS advise that all retail/upgrade consumers buy OEM and save money. -- ---------------------------------------------------------- http://www.uscricket.com "Mike Brannigan [MSFT]" <mikebran@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:etCShURvEHA.2316@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... > David, > > I a well aware of the contents of the System Build er licensing, > > As I pointed out the link to the OEM edition on eBuyer clearly states that > it will be only supplied with a non-peripheral piece of hardware and in so > doing they are complying with the letter of the reseller agreement. > > The license you are quoting from is the system builder license - which may > not necessarily the licensing terms eBuyer may be under. > > Even so if they are in breach of any of the terms of licensing for their > sale of OEM software ,that is in no way defrauding the end user as your > initial accusation stated or were you directing that accusation at us > (Microsoft) - if so again there is no fraudulent activity taking place and > you should be more careful prior to making such accusations. > > If you still feel eBuyer are in violation of their contracts and licensing > agreements with Microsoft feel free to report them to the > piracy@microsoft.com e-mail alias with details of your complaint and > supporting evidence. > -- > > Regards, > > Mike > -- > Mike Brannigan [Microsoft] > > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no > rights > > Please note I cannot respond to e-mailed questions, please use these > newsgroups > > "David Candy" <david@mvps.org> wrote in message > news:eaFwrkQvEHA.2316@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... > As the supplier is not complying with the OEM EULA (the MS to OEM > agreement) > then the supplier cannot license the OS to the user as the supplier is the > licensor but has nothing to license. > > 4.3 Each Software Unit must be distributed pursuant to the End-User > License > Agreement that accompanies > > the Software Unit. Under the terms of the EULA you are the licensor. > > > > 9. END-USER SUPPORT > > The System Builder who installs the software must provide end-user support > on terms at least as favorable as > > the terms under which the System Builder provides end-user support for any > fully assembled computer > > system. The System Builder providing the support must place its support > phone number conspicuously in the > > fully assembled computer system help files or end-user documentation > materials. > > > 15.1 You may not advertise or price any Software Unit separately from its > accompanying fully assembled > computer system or computer hardware. Except as granted in this license, > you > may not use, run, distribute, > > copy, modify, display, repackage, or reassemble any Software Units or > hardware, or any part of them. > > > I was hoping for a more official response rather than seeking to score > points from you as this is discussed here a bit. If the supplier doesn't > have to follow their license why should retail/upgrade customers (who > unlike > OEM users are YOUR customers). > -- > ---------------------------------------------------------- > http://www.uscricket.com > "Mike Brannigan [MSFT]" <mikebran@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:ObaHtfOvEHA.4028@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... >> Where do you see "fraud" of the end user? >> >> -- >> >> Regards, >> >> Mike >> -- >> Mike Brannigan [Microsoft] >> >> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no >> rights >> >> Please note I cannot respond to e-mailed questions, please use these >> newsgroups >> >> "David Candy" <david@mvps.org> wrote in message >> news:ekzpNVNvEHA.1616@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... >> So why does MS permit such blatent fraud of it's end users? >> >> -- >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> http://www.uscricket.com >> "Mike Brannigan [MSFT]" <mikebran@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> news:%23vlsoCNvEHA.3200@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl... >>> "jeffrey" <jeffrey@nospam.com> wrote in message >>> news:OgIDMWMvEHA.1988@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... >>>> Hi Will, >>>> >>>> When did that happen? I always heard Media Edition was only to be sold >>>> with >>>> prebuilt systems. >>>> >>>> Jeff >>> >>> Windows XP Media Center Edition is an OEM only product and may be only >>> sold >>> like other Microsoft OEM operating systems either with a new PC or with >>> a >>> non peripheral hardware component. >>> So on the site that Will pointed out - read the small print near the >>> bottom >>> of the page >>> "... >>> OEM Information: You receive a Certificate of Authenticity (COA) and a >>> CD >>> containing the program on it. This is a legal OEM version of the product >>> licensed by Microsoft to be sold with any "non-peripheral hardware >>> component" and is bundled as such. OEM products are not retail packaged >>> and >>> will not contain a manual. OEM versions cannot be returned under any >>> reasons >>> ..." >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Mike >>> -- >>> Mike Brannigan [Microsoft] >>> >>> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no >>> rights >>> >>> Please note I cannot respond to e-mailed questions, please use these >>> newsgroups >>> >>> "jeffrey" <jeffrey@nospam.com> wrote in message >>> news:OgIDMWMvEHA.1988@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... >>>> Hi Will, >>>> >>>> When did that happen? I always heard Media Edition was only to be sold >>>> with >>>> prebuilt systems. >>>> >>>> Jeff >>>> >>>> "Will Denny" <willdenny@mvps.org> wrote in message >>>> news:utLtETMvEHA.3376@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... >>>>> Hi >>>>> >>>>> Depends where you live: >>>>> >>>>> >>>> http://www.ebuyer.com/customer/products/index.html?rb=2653896006&action=c2hvd19wcm9kdWN0X292ZXJ2aWV3&product_uid=74686 >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> Will Denny >>>>> MS-MVP - Windows Shell/User >>>>> Please reply to the News Groups >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "jeffrey" <jeffrey@nospam.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:%23QQVyOMvEHA.3656@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... >>>>> > Hi, >>>>> > >>>>> > From what I have heard, you can`t buy the Media Edition, it is only >>>>> > provided >>>>> > to computer system manufacture`s. You can only buy the Home and Pro >>>>> > editions publicly. >>>>> > >>>>> > Jeff >>>>> > >>>>> > "Andrea" <Andrea@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >>>>> > news:D5A7AEC9-FBB0-41A0-9DB1-698EEC472A07@microsoft.com... >>>>> >> I 'm glad to know the differences between Windows Xp professional >>>>> >> and >>>>> > Windows >>>>> >> Media Center 2005. I'm planning to buy a tv tunner fo my computer >>>>> >> so >>>>> >> I >>>>> > want >>>>> >> to know if it's better to use Xp Professional or media Center. I >>>>> >> red >>>> that >>>>> >> Media center is based on windows Xp Home edition, but I tried that >>>>> >> version >>>>> >> last year then I decided to buy the professional Edition, becouse >>>>> >> is >>>> more >>>>> >> stable. So before buying the Media center Edition I need some >>>>> >> information! >>>>> >> Thanks to all for yours answers >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
- Next message: Phil: "Re: Back to original questions"
- Previous message: Wesley Vogel: "Re: Safe mode and MSConfig"
- In reply to: David Candy: "Re: Differences between Windows Xp professional and Windos Xp Media Ce"
- Next in thread: David Candy: "Re: Differences between Windows Xp professional and Windos Xp Media Ce"
- Reply: David Candy: "Re: Differences between Windows Xp professional and Windos Xp Media Ce"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]