Re: Which Registry Cleaner?
From: Ted Zieglar (teddyz_at_notmail.com)
Date: 10/18/04
- Next message: Malke: "Re: Windows XP intallation problem"
- Previous message: GerryC: "Re: SP2 Cause Internet Access Delay"
- In reply to: Unknown: "Re: Which Registry Cleaner?"
- Next in thread: Richard Urban: "Re: Which Registry Cleaner?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 12:08:20 -0400
Any performance improvement from the elimination of "300 useless entries"
exists in your head. You've bought into the hype, my friend. Big time.
-- Ted Zieglar "Unknown" <Unknown@Somewhere.Kom> wrote in message news:FsRcd.18571$Qv5.16132@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com... > Absolute hogwash. You will notice an improvement in performance if you run a > good registry cleaner. As a matter of fact, the first time a good cleaner is > run it will find over 300 useless entries. > "Ted Zieglar" <teddyz@notmail.com> wrote in message > news:eColRYStEHA.2664@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > > Do you really think so? > > > > Consider this: > > > > How many megabytes of memory does, say, one thousand redundant registry keys > > occupy? How much RAM do you have installed? How fast is your hardware? > > > > You accomplish nothing measurable (let alone perceptable) by eliminating > > those thousand registry keys, but you risk crippling your system with a > > so-called registry cleaner toy. > > > > If you're interested in speeding up your system in a way that you can > > actually notice, and you're already diligent about maintaining your > > computer, buy more RAM, a faster hard disk or a faster video card. > > -- > > Ted Zieglar > > > > > > "Prabhat" <not_a_mail@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > news:eCDBVCStEHA.2532@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > >> Hi Ted, > >> > >> Doeas Registry Gets Load while the Windows Load? If yes Then that should > >> affect the System Performance if the Size grows due to Unwanted Values in > >> it. > >> > >> Thanks > >> Prabhat > >> > >> "Ted Zieglar" <teddyz@notmail.com> wrote in message > >> news:us07t8RtEHA.4040@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > >> > Wesley is correct, of course. > >> > > >> > The proper way to deal with the registry is to leave it alone, unless > > you > >> > need to fix a specific problem that can only be repaired by editing the > >> > registry. > >> > > >> > Redundant registry entries cause no harm to your computer and do not > >> affect > >> > its performance. > >> > -- > >> > Ted Zieglar > >> > > >> > > >> > "Wesley Vogel" <123WVogel955@comcast.net> wrote in message > >> > news:ui4qw2RtEHA.3572@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... > >> > > No. XP does not do this. > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > Hope this helps. Let us know. > >> > > Wes > >> > > > >> > > In news:OA9pIRRtEHA.2536@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl, > >> > > anomynous@discusions.discussions.com > >> <anomynous@discussions.microsoft.com> > >> > > hunted and pecked: > >> > > > Do I understand correctly, that XP removes redundant registry > > entries > >> > > > left behind when programmes are un-installed. > >> > > > > >> > > > "Prabhat" <not_a_mail@hotmail.com> wrote in message > >> > > > news:ewzPrOPtEHA.1216@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > >> > > >> Hi All, > >> > > >> > >> > > >> I have XP + SP1. I use Microsoft OLD RegClean. > >> > > >> > >> > > >> Is this the Best Registry Cleaner Available? Or If not which one I > >> > > >> should Go > >> > > >> For my XP System? > >> > > >> > >> > > >> Thanks > >> > > >> Prabhat > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > >
- Next message: Malke: "Re: Windows XP intallation problem"
- Previous message: GerryC: "Re: SP2 Cause Internet Access Delay"
- In reply to: Unknown: "Re: Which Registry Cleaner?"
- Next in thread: Richard Urban: "Re: Which Registry Cleaner?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|