Re: Removal of bad sectors marked by CHKDSK

From: PCfixinman (PCfixinman_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 10/17/04


Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 08:19:03 -0700

Hi Alex,

Windows CHKDSK, is still reporting "8kb in bad sectors"
in the report after chkdsk /F is run, then OS rebooted..
Norton's disk doctor, does the same, but adds free space & security
descriptors to a CHKDSK run...(I checked the box for it to do this, otherwise
it runs the regular 3 during a CHKDSK run)

I used the seagate's seatools, to run & fix
these bad sectors...during that run, it told me it was going to overwrite
the data in the 2 bad sectors, each one = 4kb's it even stated, this data was
named
 $badsect
which is why I cannot figure out why the OS is still reporting them...
and that I cannot find anything named $badsect
when I search the drive, with all hidden files, known file names, & hidden
protected files viewable...

Any Ideas?

TIA

PCFM

"Alex Nichol" wrote:

> PCfixinman wrote:
>
> >
> >Thanks for the reply... The strange thing, is that the bad sectors were
> >fixed...Not only do they not show up, in any hdd software utlity, but the
> >drive no loger is sluggish..
> >
> >I know if I re-install XP pro, it will report 0 in bad sectors...
>
> What is reporting them as bad now? When bad sectors are so marked it is
> normally right down in a record on the disk for its own electronics to
> know about, and if the maker's software fixed the sectors it will have
> fixed these markers too - or more likely provided alternates which are
> picked up automatically and invisible to the OS
>
>
>
> --
> Alex Nichol MS MVP (Windows Technologies)
> Bournemouth, U.K. Alexn@mvps.D8E8L.org (remove the D8 bit)
>



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Removal of bad sectors marked by CHKDSK
    ... > It sounds like a bad hard disk and you should back up pertinent data and replace it. ... > | descriptors to a CHKDSK run...(I checked the box for it to do this, ... > | which is why I cannot figure out why the OS is still reporting them... ... When bad sectors are so marked it is ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: Removal of bad sectors marked by CHKDSK
    ... You want to store data on bad sectors do you? ... Windows won't help you corrupt your data. ... > in the report after chkdsk /F is run, ... > which is why I cannot figure out why the OS is still reporting them... ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: Removal of bad sectors marked by CHKDSK
    ... > This even about bad sectors anymore, as they all have been marked, & stored, ... > Windows had marked them bad during the first CHKDSK /F I ran... ... >>> which is why I cannot figure out why the OS is still reporting them... ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: Inconsistent CHKDSK results
    ... backup s/w were in one directory. ... the files with trusty old xcopy. ... Did another full chkdsk ... now reporting a error free disk in both readonly and repair mode. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.file_system)
  • Re: Check Disc wont complete from "My Computer"
    ... Below are the results of that HD Tune up Readout ... No you run Disk Defragmenter after running Disk CkeanUp and Chkdsk. ... for bad sectors in the volume's free space. ... cluster is in use, CHKDSK allocates a new cluster to do the job of the ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain)