Re: Running two firewalls? Can it be done.. should it be done?
From: SlowJet (SlowJet_at_noTY2this.com)
Date: 10/15/04
- Next message: Public posting: "Re: Amd ^4"
- Previous message: Andre Da Costa: "Re: Service Pack 2 installation problem"
- In reply to: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "Re: Running two firewalls? Can it be done.. should it be done?"
- Next in thread: Alex Nichol: "Re: Running two firewalls? Can it be done.. should it be done?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 22:28:23 GMT
You have your bits mixed up with your bites. lol
SJ
<anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:0c5901c4b303$62e2a1b0$a301280a@phx.gbl...
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>I don't expect miracles from having three spyware progs.
>>Really. But I'm also not fooling myself that six will
>>be enough.... how about nine? why not eleven?
>>Where does it end?
>
> One firewall is all you need. You only need
> other "spyware progs" if you install that junk in the
> first place. But if you do install it, then I agree
> with...
>
>>The OP to give answer to my question
>>said there was no such thing as enough protection.
>>What on earth does that translate into ????
>
> Once you decide to let it in, it will be a constant arms
> race.
>
- Next message: Public posting: "Re: Amd ^4"
- Previous message: Andre Da Costa: "Re: Service Pack 2 installation problem"
- In reply to: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "Re: Running two firewalls? Can it be done.. should it be done?"
- Next in thread: Alex Nichol: "Re: Running two firewalls? Can it be done.. should it be done?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
