Re: File bigger than 4 GB in a FAT patiton

From: Carey Frisch [MVP] (cnfrisch_at_nospamgmail.com)
Date: 10/10/04


Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 12:03:30 -0500

My mistake is to take time to reply to a totally irrelevant thread
such as this. I would much rather pursue helping others who
have a sincere desire to get the most from their Windows XP
eXPerience. Some folks, such as yourself, offer very little support
assistance to those in need of help. Instead, you would rather
troll the newsgroups and completely abuse the helpful intent of the
newsgroup. I would encourage you to read and follow the
"Rules of Conduct" before posting anything in the future:

Rules of Conduct:

Appropriate Language: The purpose of our communities is to exchange technical
information and expertise about Microsoft products. Please avoid personal attacks,
slurs, and profanity in your interactions.

Microsoft Newsgroup Rules of Conduct
http://www.microsoft.com/communities/conduct/default.mspx#XSLTsection124121120120

How to Make a Good Newsgroup Post
http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm

-- 
Carey Frisch
Microsoft MVP
Windows XP - Shell/User
Be Smart!  Protect Your PC!
http://www.microsoft.com/athome/security/protect/default.aspx
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Tom" wrote:
Yet, when you make the mistakes you do, and people call you down on it, your defense is to use the ones who defends you by copying 
and pasting quotes from them to your advantage. But, you NEVER admit when you make a mistake, and that is where you don't walk the 
MILE!
I will back SteveN here to an extent, that you do tend to follow how much you can post, rather than make quality replies, by your 
simple read and react responses. You are being very simplistic and extremely presumptuous, if you think most cannot tell you make 
many of your replies based on reading and reacting to the subject lines, as opposed to actually reading the posts. I know you won't 
reply, but I still feel you are the worst MVP here, and you only got it, because you hung around so long, that someone finally just 
gave in.
I've seen many deserving MVPs here get there titles in much less time than you, because of the accuracy of their replies, and their 
knowledge base, and not out of some sycophantic method you obviate here and have in the years you've been attempting to help here. 
Of course, like Ed Thompson, I will probably get flamed by MVPs, because they defend their own, and not out of really being correct.


Relevant Pages

  • Re: XP/SP2 and Recov Console
    ... > set of rules for MVPs or others! ... > shows up in that newsgroup. ... > to check all the newsgroups for the different replies. ... >> GaryK ...
    (microsoft.public.backoffice.smallbiz)
  • Re: File bigger than 4 GB in a FAT patiton
    ... > Microsoft Newsgroup Rules of Conduct ... > Microsoft MVP ... But, you NEVER admit when you make a mistake, and that is where you don't walk the ... > many of your replies based on reading and reacting to the subject lines, as opposed to actually reading the posts. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: Outlook Express Wont Open
    ... View, Current View, and click on Replies to my Messages. ... Please tell the newsgroup how any ... I spotted his mistake fairly soon after he had posted using ... those using OE as a news reader are ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress)
  • Re: a few SBS 2003 Exchange set up problems, Please help!
    ... > who trawl newsgroups looking for the odd small mistake in a post. ... SBS does things differently, note, so the SBS groups are usually the best ... >> When you need to post to multiple groups, please crosspost, instead ... >> check for replies in one place. ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.setup)
  • Re: RFC: Proposal for new Usenet grooup - rec.food.cooking.chat (Re: WOTD (8/13/07) - ANATOM
    ... some here consider this food ... bit wittier or more amusing than they actually are and mistake ... The answer is newsgroup called rec.food.cooking.chat. ...
    (rec.food.cooking)