Re: Must I use Real Player?
From: Alex Nichol (alexn.mvpdts_at_ntlworld.delete.com)
Date: 09/04/04
- Next message: Bruce Chambers: "Re: Installing FULL xp home onto Windows 2000"
- Previous message: Semjon: "RE: The publisher could not be verified"
- In reply to: xfile: "Re: Must I use Real Player?"
- Next in thread: Jim Macklin: "Re: Must I use Real Player?"
- Reply: Jim Macklin: "Re: Must I use Real Player?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 17:58:57 +0100
xfile wrote:
>You certainly don't have to use Real player for whatever reasons may be.
>
>Windows Media Player, for one, is come free from Microsoft and the latest
>version is 10 just been released and have some good comments on it. Go to
>Microsoft site and you should be able to find it with no problems.
It still does not provide for ra or rm files in its Preferences - File
types - and it will not play them
-- Alex Nichol MS MVP (Windows Technologies) Bournemouth, U.K. Alexn@mvps.D8E8L.org (remove the D8 bit)
- Next message: Bruce Chambers: "Re: Installing FULL xp home onto Windows 2000"
- Previous message: Semjon: "RE: The publisher could not be verified"
- In reply to: xfile: "Re: Must I use Real Player?"
- Next in thread: Jim Macklin: "Re: Must I use Real Player?"
- Reply: Jim Macklin: "Re: Must I use Real Player?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
