Re: SP2 - Do I need it?
From: Mike Brannigan [MSFT] (mikebran_at_online.microsoft.com)
Date: 09/27/04
- Next message: Jone Doe: "Re: XP upgrade"
- Previous message: Ally: "Lost XP reinstallation disc"
- In reply to: Frank: "Re: SP2 - Do I need it?"
- Next in thread: Frank: "Re: SP2 - Do I need it?"
- Reply: Frank: "Re: SP2 - Do I need it?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 21:49:59 +0100
"Frank" <Frank@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:830ADA05-55B9-4624-AF2A-D3D2953D6B9B@microsoft.com...
> Thanks, everyone!
>
> For your peace of mind (and my own!), I have no intention of connecting my
> home pc to any other computer, via the internet or otherwise. The only
> potential for infection will then be diskettes, flash drives, CD's etc,
> which
> I can scan with my anti-virus software.
>
> So the consensus would therefore be... No need to install SP2!
>
No, you should still consider SP2 for all the bug fixes and the improvements
in security for all you applications that are running including technologies
such as DEP etc; as well as the genrall stability and code performance
improvements made in SP2.
-- Regards, Mike -- Mike Brannigan [Microsoft] This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights Please note I cannot respond to e-mailed questions, please use these newsgroups "Frank" <Frank@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:830ADA05-55B9-4624-AF2A-D3D2953D6B9B@microsoft.com... > Thanks, everyone! > > For your peace of mind (and my own!), I have no intention of connecting my > home pc to any other computer, via the internet or otherwise. The only > potential for infection will then be diskettes, flash drives, CD's etc, > which > I can scan with my anti-virus software. > > So the consensus would therefore be... No need to install SP2! > > "Mike Brannigan [MSFT]" wrote: > >> "HillBillyBuddhist" <hillbillybuddhist@shoescolumbus.rr.com> wrote in >> message news:uTqrzpHpEHA.1300@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... >> > "Frank Thompson" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> > news:1bf801c4a476$1f70d140$a501280a@phx.gbl... >> > | My home pc is NOT connected to the internet (I do all my e- >> > | mail/browsing on another pc). >> > | >> > | All the features included in SP2 seem to be to do with >> > | security issues, so do I need SP2 if I only use my pc >> > | stand-alone? Or are there any other improvements that >> > | aren't being advertised? >> > | >> > | Thanks, >> > | >> > | Frank. >> > >> > Here is a list of fixes that are included in XPSP2. >> > >> > http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=811113 >> > >> > As you can see it is an impressive list that addresses many more issues >> > than >> > just online security. >> > >> > That said, *in my opinion* if I had a computer that was not and was >> > *never* >> > going to be connected to the Internet, and was performing well I >> > wouldn't >> > bother to update it. In other words if it was always going to be a >> > standalone computer performing a set group of tasks and was doing those >> > things to my satisfaction I'd leave it alone unless a problem arose >> > that >> > could conceivably be addressed by an update. >> >> You also forgot to mention that not only must that PC never have been >> connected to connect to the Internet - it must also never be on the same >> network ass any PC that has or does connect to the Internet. >> In other words a PC with out any form of networking or connectivity to >> any >> potential source of attack or infection. >> >> -- >> >> Regards, >> >> Mike >> -- >> Mike Brannigan [Microsoft] >> >> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no >> rights >> >> Please note I cannot respond to e-mailed questions, please use these >> newsgroups >> >> "HillBillyBuddhist" <hillbillybuddhist@shoescolumbus.rr.com> wrote in >> message news:uTqrzpHpEHA.1300@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... >> > "Frank Thompson" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> > news:1bf801c4a476$1f70d140$a501280a@phx.gbl... >> > | My home pc is NOT connected to the internet (I do all my e- >> > | mail/browsing on another pc). >> > | >> > | All the features included in SP2 seem to be to do with >> > | security issues, so do I need SP2 if I only use my pc >> > | stand-alone? Or are there any other improvements that >> > | aren't being advertised? >> > | >> > | Thanks, >> > | >> > | Frank. >> > >> > Here is a list of fixes that are included in XPSP2. >> > >> > http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=811113 >> > >> > As you can see it is an impressive list that addresses many more issues >> > than >> > just online security. >> > >> > That said, *in my opinion* if I had a computer that was not and was >> > *never* >> > going to be connected to the Internet, and was performing well I >> > wouldn't >> > bother to update it. In other words if it was always going to be a >> > standalone computer performing a set group of tasks and was doing those >> > things to my satisfaction I'd leave it alone unless a problem arose >> > that >> > could conceivably be addressed by an update. >> > >> > -- >> > D >> > >> > I'm not an MVP a VIP nor do I have ESP. >> > I was just trying to help. >> > Please use your own best judgment before implementing any suggestions >> > or >> > advice herein. >> > No warranty is expressed or implied. >> > Your mileage may vary. >> > See store for details. :) >> > >> > Remove shoes to E-mail. >> > >> > >> >> >>
- Next message: Jone Doe: "Re: XP upgrade"
- Previous message: Ally: "Lost XP reinstallation disc"
- In reply to: Frank: "Re: SP2 - Do I need it?"
- Next in thread: Frank: "Re: SP2 - Do I need it?"
- Reply: Frank: "Re: SP2 - Do I need it?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]