Re: Big hole??
From: User1 (user1_at_msn.net)
Date: 09/19/04
- Next message: Jupiter Jones [MVP]: "Re: Winodws XP service pack 2"
- Previous message: Mark: "Windows XP SP2 - Beta"
- In reply to: OMG!!: "Big hole??"
- Next in thread: Jone Doe: "Re: Big hole??"
- Reply: Jone Doe: "Re: Big hole??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 20:53:04 -0700
Ya - I do. What's the point?
"OMG!!" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:15a201c49dfa$5d3696e0$a501280a@phx.gbl...
Uh, do you run a firewall? If so then what are ya worried
about. Have your provider ping you, if they see a
firewall then even they can't get in, that plus the added
protection from Microsoft kinda makes you pretty
invulnerable
>-----Original Message-----
>"Windows XP Service Pack 2 with Advanced Security
Technologies helps you protect your PC against viruses,
hackers, and worms." - this is how Microsoft promotes its
Service Pack 2 on its website. What the company does not
say: Instead of viruses, worms, and hackers, the
supposedly safe SP2 for Windows XP invites any Internet
user to have a look around your PC.
>
>
>
>As soon as you install SP2 on a Windows XP PC with a
certain configuration, your file and printer sharing data
are visible worldwide, despite an activated Firewall.
This also applies to all other services. The PC only has
to provide sharing for an internal local network and
connect to the Internet via dial-up or ISDN. Users of DSL
services are also affected, if a firewall is not
integrated into the DSL modem or a common modem instead
of a DSL router is used. Additionally, Internet
Connection Sharing of the PC has to be disabled.
>
>
>
>A number of test scans run by PC-Welt revealed that this
in fact is a common configuration and not a rare sight.
Without great effort, we were able to discover private
documents on easily accessible computers on the Internet.
It must be assumed, that these users wrongly believe they
are safe and that their sharing configurations are only
visible in their network at home: Often, we did not even
encounter password protection.
>
>
>Already Windows 95 affected by a similar problem
>
>
>Experienced Windows users may remember that there was a
similar problem in the past, specifically with Windows
95. Back then, Microsoft forgot to separate file and
printer sharing from the dial-up network adapter when
such a connection was configured.
>
>
>
>In other words, this caused the service to be released
worldwide through the dial-up connection as soon as you
were connected to the Internet. Microsoft at that time
issued an update to patch the bug. The fact that file and
printer sharing since then is not connected to the dial-
up connection anymore, can easily be seen on your system:
Right-click on the symbol "My Network Places" and
select "Properties". Repeat the right-click and selection
with the icon of your dial-up connection and select the
tab "Settings". If there is no check at "File and Printer
Sharing", it indicates that this service should not be
made available through your dial-up connection.
>
>
>
>This in fact is true for Windows XP without Service
Pack. Since SP1, this configuration is hardly more than
cosmetics and does not serve any purpose anymore. This
means, the file and printer sharing service is connected
in general, also to the dial-up network adapter. This in
itself is a serious bug, since your shared data
potentially could be seen on the Internet. However, there
are no catastrophic effects, as every dial-up connection
is configured with an activated firewall by default.
>
>
>
>If you intended to deactivate this firewall, Windows
displayed an easily recognizable dialog, that this choice
would allow access to your computer. Despite the bug in
SP1, the configuration of the firewall was worked out in
a clean way: You were able to run the dial-up connection
with a firewall and the internal network card without,
because the latter was supposed to enable access through
the Windows network.
>
>
>SP1 + SP2 leads to a catastrophic error
>
>
>Due to the bug carried over from SP1 as well as a new
bug, the firewall configuration with SP2 has a
catastrophic effect. The SP2 installation simply uses the
previous configuration of the firewall: If it was active
for the dial-up connection, now it also has been
activated for the network adapter.
>
>
>
>At the same time, an exception is determined for file
and printer sharing: For the internal network card - and
astonishingly also for all adapters.
>
>
>
>With the first use of the dial-up connection after
installing SP2, all of your shared data are available on
the Internet. Now, other users can start guessing your
passwords for administrator and guest and you basically
are no more secure than the first Windows 95 users with
an Internet connection - thanks to Service Pack 2.
>
>
>How to correct the problem
>
>
>It is not advisable to keep this defective default
configuration. However, the previous environment cannot
be restored: The configuration for the firewall was
changed, which does not allow the setting of active or
inactive conditions or exceptions for each network
adapter anymore. Now this only works for network areas.
>
>
>
>Choose "Windows Firewall" in the in the Windows Control
Panel and the there the tab "Exceptions". Select "File
and Print Services" and click on "Edit". Now you can see
four ports which are used by the file and print sharing
service.
>
>
>
>To lock the service to the outside and keep it open for
the internal LAN, you have to individually select and
change its area with the respective button. Our reader
Yves Jerschov notified us of another bug: The value for
the area set by default "Only for own network (Subnet)"
only works, if the Internet Connection Sharing is
activated. If this is not the case, your shared data are
visible worldwide. This error can be corrected by
choosing "User defined List" and entering the IP
addresses that are supposed to have access - the IP
addresses of your LAN. A whole range of an IP area can be
entered as "192.168.x.0/255.255.255.0", if the respective
addresses start with 192.168.x.
>
>
>
>After these measures, you can be sure to be as safe as
you were with SP1. Great, don't you think?
>
- Next message: Jupiter Jones [MVP]: "Re: Winodws XP service pack 2"
- Previous message: Mark: "Windows XP SP2 - Beta"
- In reply to: OMG!!: "Big hole??"
- Next in thread: Jone Doe: "Re: Big hole??"
- Reply: Jone Doe: "Re: Big hole??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]