Re: SP2

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

From: Ronnie Vernon MVP (ronv_at_mvps.org)
Date: 09/14/04


Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 20:00:47 -0700

Jack wrote:
> And WHY should any vendor have to change their products so as to
> comply with a SP? Even though I disagree with it happening even
> then, I can understand why it happens for a totally new OS. But
> requiring vendors to subscribe to compliance with a upgrade to an
> existing OS is dead wrong.
>
> I'll say it again!! The upgrade should not render anything useless
> that was working just fine under the OS that was upgraded! If it
> does, the upgrade is to fault - not the vendor item!
>
> The absolute, unchecked, monopolistic arrogance of Microsoft is being
> displayed on this one - in spades!
>

Jack

You are showing that you have little knowledge about the software industry.
If a developer wants their software to work, they need an operating system
to host the software. If they want their software to continue to work
properly, they must make sure that the software is kept up to date with that
operating system. This is the way it works. It doesn't matter whether the OS
is Windows, Linux, Unix, OS2, DOS or whatever. Their is nothing monopolistic
about this.

A Service Pack is always a major change to the code for an OS. Anyone who
develops software can testify to this. Many major software programs already
had the required updates available for their applications before SP2 was
released. The vendors who did not are either lazy, don't care or are looking
to profit from the SP2 update by requiring a paid update to their programs.

-- 
Ronnie Vernon
Microsoft MVP
Windows Shell/User 


Relevant Pages

  • Re: Java and avoiding software piracy?
    ... but in practice every few weeks Microsoft upgrades ... over your hardware and much less freedom to administer your machine as ... through a hardware or OS upgrade. ... as being an advantage to anyone except the vendor. ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)
  • Re: How many sites still on V1.5 or earlier?
    ... seem to require a version upgrade with every OS upgrade ... If a vendor keeps his products up-to-date with the latest OS, ... I think customers should be able to install the latest version of the ... Only if I installed a more current version of the ISV software than the ...
    (bit.listserv.ibm-main)
  • Re: Very OT - Computers
    ... I am interested in Dell. ... overpriced by the vendor. ... as brightly when you find out the maintenance cost for special paper, ... future for less than an immediate factory upgrade. ...
    (alt.home.repair)
  • Re: SP2
    ... compliance with a upgrade to an existing OS is dead wrong. ... is to fault - not the vendor item! ... The absolute, unchecked, monopolistic arrogance of Microsoft is being ... >> every security item since. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: Very OT - Computers
    ... I am interested in Dell. ... overpriced by the vendor. ... as brightly when you find out the maintenance cost for special paper, ... future for less than an immediate factory upgrade. ...
    (alt.home.repair)