Re: NET Framework 1.1
From: Rayo. (anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 09/09/04
- Next message: Ken: "Can't connect to Terminal service throught the web?"
- Previous message: Mark James: "RE: Casey Video"
- In reply to: Karl Diethrick: "Re: NET Framework 1.1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 00:50:46 -0700
A bit late, but thank you all for your advice.
>-----Original Message-----
>The .NET framework is only needed if you want to run
programs written
>using .NET
>
>You probably already have some version of the .NET
framework installed.
> Since many software programs being released for
Windows XP are being
>written using .NET, it probably wouldn't be a bad idea to
upgrade this
>at some point. But if all your current apps are working,
I wouldn't
>worry about it too much.
>
>Then again, there may be security holes in the old
version that have
>been fixed, so that would be another good reason to
upgrade.
>
>Rayo wrote:
>> I just discovered a download for Microsoft .NET
Framework
>> on windows update. It is .NET Framework 1.1 Service
Pack 1.
>> It is 10.2 MB and am asking is it important? Would the
>> average "Joe" need to download it? I have already got
SP2
>> on my computer.It just seems a lot to download if I
won't
>> need it. I don't even know what Net Framework means.
>> Thank you.
>.
>
- Next message: Ken: "Can't connect to Terminal service throught the web?"
- Previous message: Mark James: "RE: Casey Video"
- In reply to: Karl Diethrick: "Re: NET Framework 1.1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|