Re: Drm and digital rights management letter from my senator
From: David Candy (david_at_mvps.org)
Date: 07/23/04
- Next message: David Candy: "Re: I see only pictures.."
- Previous message: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "activate"
- In reply to: Greg R: "Drm and digital rights management letter from my senator"
- Next in thread: hermes: "Re: Drm and digital rights management letter from my senator"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 04:35:59 +1000
Well it's a pity the US didn't OBEY Article 1 of your constitution in the 1800s where stolen european patents built your country's current economy.
-- ---------------------------------------------------------- 'Not happy John! Defending our democracy', http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/06/29/1088392635123.html "Greg R" <webworm12@yes.hotmail.com> wrote in message news:iqk2g011iavu2good480hr9vej0b3as94f@4ax.com... > Here is a letter I received from my senator. Please, pardon the long > post. > > Greg R > > Thank you for sharing with me your insights into the debate over > digital copyrights and digital rights management. I understand your > concern for protecting the freedom and privacy of individual Internet > users. > > Despite passage of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998, which > I supported, some difficult questions remain unanswered in the debate > over how to protect the rights of music artists and producers to > protect their intellectual property versus the recognized right of > consumers to make recordings for personal use. This law made it > illegal to circumvent a technological copyright-control measure, such > as encryption circuitry built into CD and DVD players. > > In the last session of Congress, several bills were introduced that > would have enhanced protections for copyright owners, while other > bills were introduced to enhance the rights of individuals to fair-use > access to digital media. None of these bills were enacted. As > expected, this debate has re-emerged in the current session of > Congress, most recently with public attention focusing on remarks by > Senator Hatch during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. > > Senator Hatch was widely quoted as saying he would favor development > of technology to disable or damage computers that are repeatedly used > for illegal downloads of copyrighted material. This comment > understandably created a backlash of response from computer owners who > make use of peer-to-peer file sharing technology. > > Much public attention is also focusing on legislation introduced by > Senator Wyden to require producers and distributors of copyrighted > digital material to disclose any technical devices or codes that would > prevent a person from copying or transferring the content. This bill, > known as the Consumer Right to Know Act, is under consideration in the > Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation. > > Article I of the Constitution empowers Congress "to promote the > progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to > authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings > and discoveries." In the age of the Internet and digital > communications, this has become a significant challenge. > > There are numerous complex facets to this issue, which I do not expect > to be resolved soon. Fundamentally, we are trying to balance the > intellectual property rights of creators against the economic > imperative to let technological innovation run its course. New > technologies emerge daily providing exciting new ways to share > information. I am supportive of new technologies, but I do not believe > that new technology alone should lead to the abrogation of established > laws. > > It may be that the copyright laws ultimately need to be modified in > light of new mechanisms for music distribution and new models of > business, but further study of these issues will be required. I will > continue to follow this carefully, and I appreciate your interest. > > Again, thank you for contacting me. > >
- Next message: David Candy: "Re: I see only pictures.."
- Previous message: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "activate"
- In reply to: Greg R: "Drm and digital rights management letter from my senator"
- Next in thread: hermes: "Re: Drm and digital rights management letter from my senator"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|