Re: Diskeeper 7.0 versus Norton Speed Disk
From: Plato (|_at_|.|)
Date: 06/09/04
- Next message: Todd Chandler: "Two XP Client Machines that fail to register with DNS"
- Previous message: rhonda: "browsers"
- In reply to: Thomas: "Re: Diskeeper 7.0 versus Norton Speed Disk"
- Next in thread: Alex Nichol: "Re: Diskeeper 7.0 versus Norton Speed Disk"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 9 Jun 2004 12:43:09 -0500
Thomas wrote:
>
> I made a defrag at the boot with Diskeeper (defrag the Master File
> Table (MFT)etc.) I guess i should renew Bootvis ?
>From MS:
"Please note that Bootvis.exe is not a tool that will improve
boot/resume performance
for end users. Contrary to some published reports, Bootvis.exe cannot
reduce or alter a system's boot or resume performance."
http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/sysperf/fastboot/BootVis.mspx
-- http://www.bootdisk.com/
- Next message: Todd Chandler: "Two XP Client Machines that fail to register with DNS"
- Previous message: rhonda: "browsers"
- In reply to: Thomas: "Re: Diskeeper 7.0 versus Norton Speed Disk"
- Next in thread: Alex Nichol: "Re: Diskeeper 7.0 versus Norton Speed Disk"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|