Re: Legality of OEM Win XP 1-2 CPU
From: none (none_at_none.com)
Date: 06/04/04
- Next message: Travis King: "Unstable Explorer"
- Previous message: Adi Oltean [MSFT]: "Re: VSS (Volume Shadow Copy Services)"
- In reply to: Tee: "Re: Legality of OEM Win XP 1-2 CPU"
- Next in thread: Tee: "Re: Legality of OEM Win XP 1-2 CPU"
- Reply: Tee: "Re: Legality of OEM Win XP 1-2 CPU"
- Reply: kurttrail: "Re: Legality of OEM Win XP 1-2 CPU"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 00:31:13 GMT
Lets see, theft is not illegal. cool.
You and Ashley really need to hook up. You guys would rule the world.
So I could by just one copy of microsoft office and install it on all 300
PCs and not worry about any reprocussions? Is it ok if I get audited to tell
them Tee said it OK.
"Tee" <crappolagozhere@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:2i9s56Fl2japU1@uni-berlin.de...
> "none" <none@none.com> wrote in message
news:9oOvc.14214$sI.432@attbi_s52...
> > Nice creative thinking. To bad what you have done is illegal.
> >
> > NT, W2K pro, XP Pro all support dual processors (2 CPUs on the same
mother
> > board)
>
> Its in violation of MS's EULA but not illegal.
>
> --
> Tara
>
>
- Next message: Travis King: "Unstable Explorer"
- Previous message: Adi Oltean [MSFT]: "Re: VSS (Volume Shadow Copy Services)"
- In reply to: Tee: "Re: Legality of OEM Win XP 1-2 CPU"
- Next in thread: Tee: "Re: Legality of OEM Win XP 1-2 CPU"
- Reply: Tee: "Re: Legality of OEM Win XP 1-2 CPU"
- Reply: kurttrail: "Re: Legality of OEM Win XP 1-2 CPU"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|