Re: WPA info & program?

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

From: Michael Stevens (xpnews_at_notmvps.org)
Date: 05/05/04 

Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 05:00:22 -0700

kurttrail wrote:
> Michael Stevens wrote:
>
>> "kurttrail" <dontemailme@anywhereintheknownuniverse.org> wrote in
>> message
>> news:%23JhNgBPMEHA.936@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>>> Michael Stevens wrote:
>>>
>>>> "kurttrail" <dontemailme@anywhereintheknownuniverse.org> wrote in
>>>> message news:%23PbWvmDMEHA.624@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>>>>> Michael Stevens wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "kurttrail" <dontemailme@anywhereintheknownuniverse.org> wrote in
>>>>>> message news:e0KDiV8LEHA.268@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>> Brian C wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That information is hidden on purpose. So you could not reset
>>>>>>>> yourself. (Mike going to getting on me for saying this). You
>>>>>>>> could try contacting the guy who made the reset patch.
>>>>>>>> Regardless a lot of people already know about this. It all
>>>>>>>> over cnet news & other website.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Brian C.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I believe the reset crack for PA is to reset the 30 day clock
>>>>>>> for initial activation, not to reset the hardware change count.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Michaels reply:
>>>>>> You give good information freely, but when you are confronted and
>>>>>> have no real answer you become an as*hole.
>>>>>
>>>>> When haven't I had an answered? I had already answered all your
>>>>> mischaracterizations previously in the thread, "Creating system
>>>>> recovery disc," and I felt no need to repeat myself just because
>>>>> you
>>>>> repeated and expanded on them.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Why do you do this?
>>>>>
>>>>> Because it is a waste of time argueing with you once you start
>>>>> perverting reality. Even this reply is a waste, but just on the
>>>>> off
>>>>> chance that somebody other than you cares, about all this, I'm
>>>>> just putting this in some
>>>>> context.
>>>>>
>>>>>> It
>>>>>> must be ego driven, because there is no other reason to drege up
>>>>>> denigrating posts from 2 yrs ago like the one below you posted as
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> recent reply to a confrontational thread between yourself and I
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> I thought you would have the integrity to use your intellect
>>>>>> rather
>>>>>> than your crass as*hole mentality.
>>>>>
>>>>> I brought up an unbiased look at our newsgroup "relationship,"
>>>>> from Fred Retread. That it is NEARLY 2 years old, doesn't make
>>>>> it any less valid today. I refuse to repeat myself over & over
>>>>> again answering your sly mischaracterizations in an effort to get
>>>>> me to appear angry. I've learned from Fred's constructive
>>>>> criticism.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snip> Your reply pasting text from posts that are two years old
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> if anyone really looks at the alleged accusation that I was lying
>>>>>> would see it was a misunderstanding that kurttrail used as a
>>>>>> unjust
>>>>>> assessment of the entire thread. See the below and you will see
>>>>>> his
>>>>>> agenda.
>>>>>
>>>>> For anyone that really cares, and I really do suspect that Mike is
>>>>> the only
>>>>> one that really does, please read this in the context of the whole
>>>>> thread, and see for yourself, if Fred's criticism from nearly two
>>>>> years ago is or isn't still applicable today.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&threadm=4b0201c42bfd%24abdeeb90%24a101280a%40phx.gbl&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dg:thl1462336809d%26dq%3D%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26selm%3D4b0201c42bfd%2524abdeeb90%2524a101280a%2540phx.gbl
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok, I lied. Sue me!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have some more to say, and I'm not gonna let even my own words
>>>>>> stand in the way! <vbg>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "In this thread as well as in the 'licensing' one, and all the
>>>>>> others I've read for that matter, I think kurt won the legitimate
>>>>>> argument early on. Then you switched to the strategy of slyly
>>>>>> mischaracterizing something he had said, which gets him every
>>>>>> time,
>>>>>> and makes him look
>>>>>> like an angry person. At the end of the resulting spiral of
>>>>>> posts,
>>>>>> the points are forgotten and you play the part of a frustrated
>>>>>> rational
>>>>>> person bowing out of the situation. I've never been clear on
>>>>>> what trolling is. Is that trolling?" - Fred Retread [
>>>>>> http://www.microscum.com/mlslies/ - Post # 42 ]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have the ability to learn from the constructive criticism of
>>>>>> others. I'm not going to appear as blowing my top with you over
>>>>>> your
>>>>>> deliberate mischaracterizations, and will learn from my past
>>>>>> mistakes, before this degenerates further into the madness [mine
>>>>>> apparently is anger, yours obviously is lunacy], as seen at the
>>>>>> above link. So I'm just gonna jump over the middle part, and
>>>>>> just skip to the part where we've forgotten
>>>>>> what the point is, [obviously you already have anyway] and I just
>>>>>> let you squeal over what a horrible person I am! <vbg>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "I f*ck you're dead daddy's diseased skull, and when I'm done I
>>>>>> let
>>>>>> my dog f*ck you're dead daddy's diseased skull too! ;^)"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Squeal away, Mikey! PSML!
>>>>>
>>>>> Squeal away! I was laughing so hard I even miss-spelled PMSL!
>>>>> But the funniest part is that Mike had to export his squealing to
>>>>> another thread! ROFL!
>>>>
>>>> There is no squealing on my part, just a realistic description of
>>>> your
>>>> agenda. I am no longer shocked by your rhetoric, but I am offended
>>>> by
>>>> it. Any normal person would be. Normal people don't use your
>>>> tactics to strong-arm an opinion or point of view. Hope you didn't
>>>> piss yourself for no reason. LOL.
>>>> BTW, the export of the thread was a mistake. I had a crash on the
>>>> system I originally started the reply and when I resumed I chose
>>>> the wrong post to reply to.
>>>
>>>
>>> Squeal Away! I did promise to let you do it! "So I'm just gonna
>>> jump
>>> over the middle part, and just skip to the part where we've
>>> forgotten what the point is, [obviously you already have anyway]
>>> and I just let you squeal over what a horrible person I am!"
>>>
>>> Hell, not only did you forget the point, you forgot the whole
>>> thread! ROFL!
>>>
>>> Please, oh pretty please, squeal some more for me! <vbg>
>>>
>>> Oh, and Mike, this has nothing to do with my agenda. This is merely
>>> for
>>> my
>>> own personal entertainment purposes, my faithful little
>>> organ-grinder! "Thanks for the memories!"
>> <Your said>
>> "Squeal Away! I did promise to let you do it! "
>> <Have no clue why you said it>
>
> ROFL! You just have no clue, Period.
>
>> Have not a clue what you are gloating about, I explained why this
>> thread "exported".
>
> Like it is a credible explanation?
>
> "BTW, the export of the thread was a mistake. I had a crash on the
> system I
> originally started the reply and when I resumed I chose the wrong post
> to
> reply to."
>
> LOL! You obviously never had any intention of replying to the post in
> it's proper thread, otherwise there would have been no need to repeat
> my post from that proper thread at the end of your first post in this
> one, as it would have already been a part of your reply.
>

I hate even making another post to this thread, but your insistence that I
am lying makes it necessary to show how you misinterrupterpt what really
happened.
If you really looked at the thread I replied to, you would realize I would
not ever "export" to such an irrelevant thread as this one. I was replying
from a remote desktop and for some reason my newsgroup rules did not show
the same results. I copied the reply from the remote desktop system I was
accessing the newsgroups to the computer I usually post from and that I made
the original reply that was lost. I did a CTRL+H and posted to what I
thought was the same thread. I quickly scanned the post, saw a Mike and
thought it was the correct thread. All the rest of the crap you posted
assumes your assessment of my mistake was intentional. Just like the
original accusation of my LIE, this also a BIG misunderstanding.
I do have some screen shots to correrabate my explanation of the real way
the events unfolded.
http://michaelstevenstech.com/kurtreply1.jpg
http://michaelstevenstech.com/kurtreply2.jpg
http://michaelstevenstech.com/kurtreply3.jpg
http://michaelstevenstech.com/kurtreply4.jpg

The part snipped was really unsubstantanative crap. 

-- 
Michael Stevens MS-MVP XP
xpnews@bogusmichaelstevenstech.com
http://michaelstevenstech.com
For a better newsgroup experience. Setup a newsreader.
http://michaelstevenstech.com/outlookexpressnewreader.htm

Relevant Pages

  • Re: A lurkers take on C.L.C pedantry
    ... but only redirect it somewhere else? ... In this newsgroup there are those who have little actual clue about C, ... The biggest ``off topic'' yellers have the smallest clue. ... The only thing that inspires confidence is when the person answering the ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: AZED 1932
    ... You proclaimed exactly that in your very first posting to this ... "rules" that somehow have authority in this newsgroup. ... would seem to be essential in the case of a homonym clue where both ...
    (rec.puzzles.crosswords)
  • Re: A lurkers take on C.L.C pedantry
    ... The biggest ``off topic'' yellers have the smallest clue. ... newsgroup would probably be able to make that determination too. ... The point is to avoid posting any answers (other than redirection) ... known to be to quick to mark a query as off-topic, ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: Windows XP Installation Procedure
    ... > computer from the internet before running the upgrade. ... Go to Windows update and apply all critical updates that apply to ... Michael Stevens MS-MVP XP ... For a better newsgroup experience. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.setup_deployment)
  • Re: A Question For Mike Stevens
    ... You might not believe that owe Andrew an opology, which can be understandable if you take the whole matter into context, but you certainly owe all the other MVP's a public one for this behaviour. ... The Andrew E. that Michael Stevens is referring to consistently gives bad if not outright dangerous advice. ... For a better newsgroup experience. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)