Re: Re:Subject?

From: phrogee (phrogee_at_greenwater.wet)
Date: 05/04/04 

Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 21:06:24 GMT

O.K. I apologize. I can see where you thought I want to start a new thread
from an old thread. I guess starting a new thread is really what is being
done. The object of what I'm asking is for your reply to go to the top of
the list. This can be helpful when a pertinent answer to a good question can
be useful to many others. Most people don't scroll down very far for older
messages and they are forgotten. Somehow you take the message ID and paste
it after news: etc. etc. and this is what I'm trying to find out, how to do
it correctly.

I have/had no intensions of upsetting anyone when I posted. 

-- 
phrogee
"Phil (purplehaz)" <I.fix.probs@for.you> wrote in message
news:unqLzvgMEHA.3712@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Dude, what the hell are you smoking? Break out. I simply answered your
> original question. You are surely confused on how newsgroups work. I
didn't
> go looking for your old post from days ago, I didn't want to. I answered
the
> question you asked. Your original question was about if you should start a
> new thread or stay in the same thread and I answered you. You said nothing
> about having a look at your old post to see if I could help, you asked a
> question and I answered it. What is this you "found" and what is its
> realavance to the orignal question is this thread? Get a clue.
>
> phrogee wrote:
> > Gee, look what I just found..........................
> >
> > Re: Upgrade from Home to Pro Problem.  <---------------------Look
> > Here!!!!!!!!
> >
> >
> >> I get my facts from the internet and then tried it myself. Where do
> >> you get your ignorance? Now, if you want the link, ask nicely and I
> >> might provide it. Here are things that xp pro does that with tweaks
> >> xp home will do: Run a IIS web server
> >> Advanced file sharing and security functionality
> >> Uninstall messenger
> >> Access to advanced user management screen
> >> Acess to domain resources without specifying a password each time.
> >>
> >> Woody wrote:
> >>> Where do you get your facts? Surely you must be making this up as
> >>> you go along.
> >
> > Kind of shot you response to me all to hell, didn't
> > it???????????????????????
> >
> > Looks like Woody caught on fast to your inane responses!
> >
> > Wise up, I'm not a newbie!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>
> Again I have no idea what you're talking about here. Woody was ignorant to
> the fact that xp home can be tweaked to do things xp pro. I explained to
him
> that there are ways to do this. So actually shot his ignorant response to
> hell. I proved him wrong......... so again what are you talking about.
> You are a newbie, it's pretty clear. And your very confused as well.
>
>
> >
> >
> > "Phil (purplehaz)" <I.fix.probs@for.you> wrote in message
> > news:%23Ey3AZfMEHA.3016@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> >>
> >>
> >> phrogee wrote:
> >>> "Phil (purplehaz)" <I.fix.probs@for.you> wrote in message
> >>> news:e9w66XeMEHA.128@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> >>>> phrogee wrote:
> >>>>> Might be a little OT, but how do you reply to an older thread in a
> >>>>> new thread without the thread going to the old post? Where do you
> >>>>> paste the message ID, etc? Using OE.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> You don't. Always reply in the original thread so all can see what
> >>>> your talking about.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> From 3 or 4 days ago? Get serious!
> >>
> >> Yes, from 3-4 days ago. If you posted a question and someone replied
> >> and you want to reply again stay in the same thread. That person
> >> should have messages they answered marked for easy reading for at
> >> least 7-10 days, so they will still respond. I usually will keep
> >> checking messages I responded to for 5-7 days. If no other replies
> >> show up, I stop checking it. Most likely if the person that was
> >> helping you is good they will continue to help untill you need no
> >> more. If you want to re-post your original question then go right
> >> ahead. 3-4 days waiting to re-post is fine, just stay in that thread
> >> once you receive replies.
>
>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Re:Subject?
    ... The response from woody that you quoted was from an entirely ... Please learn to use newsgroups, ... >>> once you receive replies. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: Pot arrests up
    ... >> I replied the way I did because my response to Juba was used as an ... I reply directly to Kenny ... >> to Juba. ... You would be amazed how many nasty posts and replies ...
    (alt.support.chronic-pain)
  • Re: Disable prompting for updates
    ... As to the kind of replies I give, ... Programming is a form of communication. ... observe without guessing, and that is that you need to discipline your ... response designed to indicate this in an illustrative way. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework)
  • Re: Ancient sites and bodily sensations
    ... response to what I perceived as the question. ... Which is a pity. ... Yes, a pity, but I'm not here to trade insults, so any further replies ... to her posts seem pointless. ...
    (uk.religion.pagan)
  • Re: fixed block size
    ... For Patrice the ally's polish, depending on me it's complete, whereas ... Woody, in response to possessions ...
    (sci.crypt)