Re: Re:Subject?
From: Phil \(purplehaz\) (I.fix.probs_at_for.you)
Date: 05/04/04
- Next message: phrogee: "Re: Debugger"
- Previous message: Alex Nichol: "Re: Academic"
- In reply to: phrogee: "Re: Re:Subject?"
- Next in thread: phrogee: "Re: Re:Subject?"
- Reply: phrogee: "Re: Re:Subject?"
- Reply: phrogee: "Re: Re:Subject?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 15:13:54 -0400
Dude, what the hell are you smoking? Break out. I simply answered your
original question. You are surely confused on how newsgroups work. I didn't
go looking for your old post from days ago, I didn't want to. I answered the
question you asked. Your original question was about if you should start a
new thread or stay in the same thread and I answered you. You said nothing
about having a look at your old post to see if I could help, you asked a
question and I answered it. What is this you "found" and what is its
realavance to the orignal question is this thread? Get a clue.
phrogee wrote:
> Gee, look what I just found..........................
>
> Re: Upgrade from Home to Pro Problem. <---------------------Look
> Here!!!!!!!!
>
>
>> I get my facts from the internet and then tried it myself. Where do
>> you get your ignorance? Now, if you want the link, ask nicely and I
>> might provide it. Here are things that xp pro does that with tweaks
>> xp home will do: Run a IIS web server
>> Advanced file sharing and security functionality
>> Uninstall messenger
>> Access to advanced user management screen
>> Acess to domain resources without specifying a password each time.
>>
>> Woody wrote:
>>> Where do you get your facts? Surely you must be making this up as
>>> you go along.
>
> Kind of shot you response to me all to hell, didn't
> it???????????????????????
>
> Looks like Woody caught on fast to your inane responses!
>
> Wise up, I'm not a newbie!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Again I have no idea what you're talking about here. Woody was ignorant to
the fact that xp home can be tweaked to do things xp pro. I explained to him
that there are ways to do this. So actually shot his ignorant response to
hell. I proved him wrong......... so again what are you talking about.
You are a newbie, it's pretty clear. And your very confused as well.
>
>
> "Phil (purplehaz)" <I.fix.probs@for.you> wrote in message
> news:%23Ey3AZfMEHA.3016@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>>
>>
>> phrogee wrote:
>>> "Phil (purplehaz)" <I.fix.probs@for.you> wrote in message
>>> news:e9w66XeMEHA.128@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>>>> phrogee wrote:
>>>>> Might be a little OT, but how do you reply to an older thread in a
>>>>> new thread without the thread going to the old post? Where do you
>>>>> paste the message ID, etc? Using OE.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You don't. Always reply in the original thread so all can see what
>>>> your talking about.
>>>>
>>>
>>> From 3 or 4 days ago? Get serious!
>>
>> Yes, from 3-4 days ago. If you posted a question and someone replied
>> and you want to reply again stay in the same thread. That person
>> should have messages they answered marked for easy reading for at
>> least 7-10 days, so they will still respond. I usually will keep
>> checking messages I responded to for 5-7 days. If no other replies
>> show up, I stop checking it. Most likely if the person that was
>> helping you is good they will continue to help untill you need no
>> more. If you want to re-post your original question then go right
>> ahead. 3-4 days waiting to re-post is fine, just stay in that thread
>> once you receive replies.
- Next message: phrogee: "Re: Debugger"
- Previous message: Alex Nichol: "Re: Academic"
- In reply to: phrogee: "Re: Re:Subject?"
- Next in thread: phrogee: "Re: Re:Subject?"
- Reply: phrogee: "Re: Re:Subject?"
- Reply: phrogee: "Re: Re:Subject?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|