Re: ZoneAlarm Pro, Sygate Personal Firewall, or built in xp firewall?
From: CZ (CZ_at_no99spam.com)
Date: 05/21/04
- Next message: Fred 2002: "Re: Reformat & Reinstall XP Home"
- Previous message: Phil: "Re: XP Home missing user & logon"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Lars-Erik Østerud: "Re: ZoneAlarm Pro, Sygate Personal Firewall, or built in xp firewall?"
- Next in thread: S.Heenan: "Re: ZoneAlarm Pro, Sygate Personal Firewall, or built in xp firewall?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 10:20:49 -0700
> ICF is stateful, and ZA is stateless, so ICF can provide technology that
ZA lacks
What is the difference, please explain.
Lars:
A stateless firewall can only drop a packet per info in that single packet.
A stateful firewall maintains a connection state table and can use
additional info to drop packets.
Examples:
1) ACK scan (aka TCP ping):
Hackers can send an ACK packet to see if an address is active.
A stateless f/w cannot drop the packet because it cannot verify if it is
part of an existing connection.
A stateful f/w can drop the packet per info in the connection state table.
2) Dynamic blocking of source address (SA) spoofing:
A stateless f/w cannot do it because it does not retain info from any
packet, a stateful f/w can use its table to verify the SA.
The above is before mktg gets involved. LinkSys started claiming SPI
(stateful packet inspection) as a feature of their routers several years
ago, and then would not clarify what the phrase meant. Tests by
knowledgeable people suggested the concept was not stateful.
- Next message: Fred 2002: "Re: Reformat & Reinstall XP Home"
- Previous message: Phil: "Re: XP Home missing user & logon"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Lars-Erik Østerud: "Re: ZoneAlarm Pro, Sygate Personal Firewall, or built in xp firewall?"
- Next in thread: S.Heenan: "Re: ZoneAlarm Pro, Sygate Personal Firewall, or built in xp firewall?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|