Re: FAT32 or NTFS?

From: Folkert Rienstra (see_reply-to_at_myweb.nl)
Date: 05/15/04 

Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 14:34:29 +0200

>
> Jeesh. a decade of experience with thousands of NTFS-based systems at
> one of the biggest banks in the world must count for something. Every
> time I looked at an old machine that was still FAT32 I found all these
> mystery .CHK files. These don't happen, all practical pruposes with
> NTFS. If one of my tech staff raised his hand and said "I can might
> be able to recover those files for you sir, but it will take me a day,
> and it may not get the data back", I'd tell him he had more important
> things to do.

Hey Al, maybe you should ask your "staff" how to fix your attribution line.

"Al Dykes" <adykes@panix.com> wrote in message news:c83arc$nai$1@panix3.panix.com...
> In article <eok7a0dfs9jmq96bh0s9psbo2hsaqejk8c@4ax.com>,
> cquirke (MVP Win9x) <cquirkenews@removethis.mvps.org> wrote:
> >On Wed, 12 May 2004 19:42:19 +0530, "DILIP" <dilipr@#*&!%l.com> wrote:
> >

[snip]