Re: Slow...but not the usual suspects. A hand, anyone?
From: cquirke (MVP Win9x) (cquirkenews_at_nospam.mvps.org)
Date: 05/10/04
- Next message: Klaus Dakmann: "I deleted lsass.exe in the dos mode!"
- Previous message: Jim Macklin: "Re: Hey!"
- In reply to: Gerry Cornell: "Re: Slow...but not the usual suspects. A hand, anyone?"
- Next in thread: Gerry Cornell: "Re: Slow...but not the usual suspects. A hand, anyone?"
- Reply: Gerry Cornell: "Re: Slow...but not the usual suspects. A hand, anyone?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 00:47:05 +0200
On Mon, 10 May 2004 20:51:40 +0100, "Gerry Cornell"
>The consensus of opinion currently seems to be that 256 mb memory is the
>minimum for Windows XP
256M is fine, and I find 128M is pretty uneventful as well. But if
you want to run big apps as well as the OS, you'd need more.
Unless pagefile is too small and/or HD space is tight, shrinking RAM
down to 128M would not be expected to cause stability problems other
than that of wider critical windows as the system slows down++
>-------------------- ----- ---- --- -- - - - -
Tip Of The Day:
To disable the 'Tip of the Day' feature...
>-------------------- ----- ---- --- -- - - - -
- Next message: Klaus Dakmann: "I deleted lsass.exe in the dos mode!"
- Previous message: Jim Macklin: "Re: Hey!"
- In reply to: Gerry Cornell: "Re: Slow...but not the usual suspects. A hand, anyone?"
- Next in thread: Gerry Cornell: "Re: Slow...but not the usual suspects. A hand, anyone?"
- Reply: Gerry Cornell: "Re: Slow...but not the usual suspects. A hand, anyone?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|