Re: Optical better than non-optical?
From: Last Boy Scout (LastBoyScout_at_whitehouse.gov)
Date: 04/10/04
- Next message: Rick \: "Re: windows file name"
- Previous message: dev: "Re: unable to click hyperlink URL to open browser"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Piotr Makley: "Optical better than non-optical?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 15:47:45 -0500
I have had a Microsoft Optical mouse for over 2 years.
Normally within 6 months a regular mouse would give me problems and
have to be constantly cleaned or replaced.
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 23:02:38 +0100, Piotr Makley <pmakley@mail.com>
wrote:
>"E2E t-bot BT" <English-to-English.translator.bot@Babel.Fish>
>wrote:
>
>> I am still using a corded mouse (logitech wheelmouse).
>>
>> I would like to get a better mouse which has at least as good
>> precision, responsiveness, accuracy, etc.
>>
>> Would an optical mouse be better on all counts?
>>
>> What about a cordless mouse. Are they poor performers? What
>> about a Bluetooth connection - is that good. Is it pricey.
>>
>> Are there any web sites which discuss this. Google is no help
>> to me.
>
>
>Assuming both are cord-attached then is an optical mouse is
>inherently better than a non-optical mouse?
- Next message: Rick \: "Re: windows file name"
- Previous message: dev: "Re: unable to click hyperlink URL to open browser"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Piotr Makley: "Optical better than non-optical?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
