Re: XP systems requirements?
From: Steven (none_at_myisp.com)
Date: 04/19/04
- Next message: Steven: "Re: Making it legal"
- Previous message: Malke: "Re: changing drive letters"
- In reply to: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "XP systems requirements?"
- Next in thread: Vagabond Software: "Re: XP systems requirements?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 09:18:44 -0400
I have a P3 1000, with 384 Mb RAM and unless I set everything to look like
win98 and put all settings to best performance (ie no frills), it puts a lot
of drag on my machine. I would suggest that you stay where you are, until
you can get a better machine. AMDs 64bit chip would be best, since it would
take full advantage of the new version of windows coming out in the next
year or so.
<anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:0e0101c4260e$4a5e53f0$a601280a@phx.gbl...
> I presently have a 300mhz PII with 191 MB extended memory
> running Windows 98. I'm considering upgrading the
> operating system to XP. I note that a 300mhz rocessor is
> the minimum speed for XP.
>
> Any problems loading XP on a minimum 300 mhz processor?
> One comment from a friend said he thought my memory was
> too light to effectively run XP.
>
> Any thoughts?
- Next message: Steven: "Re: Making it legal"
- Previous message: Malke: "Re: changing drive letters"
- In reply to: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "XP systems requirements?"
- Next in thread: Vagabond Software: "Re: XP systems requirements?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
