Re: I want to keep my hard drive stuff

Tech-Archive recommends: Fix windows errors by optimizing your registry

From: -xiray- (do_not_at_e-mail.me)
Date: 03/31/04


Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 02:51:37 GMT

On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 20:27:59 GMT, Ron Martell <ron@onlinehelp.bc.ca>
wrote:

>-xiray- <do_not@e-mail.me> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>But, it is my experience that your system will run better (and faster)
>>if you reformat your hard drive and install WinXP cleanly. I've done
>>it both ways.
>>

>And in the years since the release of XP I have worked with many of my
>customers to upgrade their existing systems to Windows XP. I cannot
>recall a single instance where there were any performance or
>reliability issues with the upgrades.

An upgrade install is easy and takes little time and probably makes it
look to your customers like you know what you're doing because the job
is done so quickly. After all what would they think if you sat for 7
hours as you cleanly installed, updated all the drivers, and
reinstalled all the software. They'd probably think you were nuts or
incompetent. So I can understand why you'd upgrade OTHER people's
machines. But come on, you wouldn't do that to your own box would you?

When first installed, sure the upgrade seems to run fine. However over
the long haul as you continue to upgrade drivers and add and remove
software, an upgrade install is more likely to slow down and you are
more likely to run into trouble.

Could an average office worker's machine be upgrade installed, sure.
What do the drones in cubicles know. Most can't find where Outlook has
saved that file attachment they just received.

But you must know that no serious user or gamer would consider an
upgrade install of XP to be the optimal path to take. If you don't
know the pitfalls then you've been living in ... well... some remote
place... like Canada.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: possible bug
    ... I did not receive any error messages during the install, ... I have several machines on which I upgraded the office suite. ... UPGRADE install of office 2007 as administrator. ...
    (microsoft.public.office.setup)
  • Re: Can gcc 4.0 be used to build DBI modules if perl is bulit with gcc 3.3?
    ... We have loaded Tiger onto several machines here. ... My production machine still uses 10.39 and I am afraid to upgrade ... because of the problems we are seeing trying to install the DBI and DBD ... had DBI and DBD installed in perl on the 10.39 MacOSX. ...
    (perl.dbi.users)
  • Re: Web vs. Desktop based systems
    ... provider with better privacy policy (perhaps Yahoo) also provides ... to other folder or reporting spam or changing the filter recipes. ... But how do you *really* know the important upgrade that keeps ... The alert-window doesn't exactly say *why* you need to install this ...
    (comp.programming)
  • Re: Access 2003 Runtime questions
    ... several of his machines he has A2000 as well. ... runtime of the app. ... Full version or the Upgrade version is. ... Q3) Do I need to install .Net Framework 2.0 in order to create runtimes? ...
    (comp.databases.ms-access)
  • Re: Requesting some leniency on your piracy protection program ple
    ... If Windows is retail, not at all. ... You can reinstall, upgrade, move to a different computer all you want as long as it is only installed on one computer at a time. ... The things I do not get, is not being able to> install the same ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)