Re: Virtual Memory
From: cquirke (MVP Win9x) (cquirkenews_at_nospam.mvps.org)
Date: 03/29/04
- Next message: R. McCarty: "Re: Intel Hyper-threading -- pointless on the desktop?"
- Previous message: Sharon F: "Re: HTML"
- In reply to: Phil: "Re: Virtual Memory"
- Next in thread: Ken Blake, MVP: "Re: Virtual Memory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 22:36:47 +0200
On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 09:26:06 -0800, "Phil"
>what shouldi raise my max size too?
It depends. I use 512M on the systems I build, rarely more, but I
don't have 12 different user accounts and other users who never log
out (so everyone else's session has to hang around in the pagefile)
If you do run a lot of large stuff and/or have sloppy account habits,
especially with fast user switching, you may need to pig out further.
>-------------------- ----- ---- --- -- - - - -
Running Windows-based av to kill active malware is like striking
a match to see if what you are standing in is water or petrol.
>-------------------- ----- ---- --- -- - - - -
- Next message: R. McCarty: "Re: Intel Hyper-threading -- pointless on the desktop?"
- Previous message: Sharon F: "Re: HTML"
- In reply to: Phil: "Re: Virtual Memory"
- Next in thread: Ken Blake, MVP: "Re: Virtual Memory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]