Re: MicroMonopoly aids Terrorism?

From: E McCann (love.nodotshere.myquadra_at_mad.scientist.com)
Date: 03/26/04 

Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 21:50:01 -0800

Can we cut out the crossposts?

BTW, I'd put money down you wouldn't find oleaut32.dll in DOS.... DOS has no
DLLs, for starters. It doesn't support object linking and embedding (OLE,)
and it's not 32 bit...

"Jim Carlock" <anonymous@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:eYElvAuEEHA.2548@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Microsoft doesn't make only one OS.
>
> WinXP has a different oleaut32.dll than Win2k than Win9x than
> DOS. Point in case, Microsoft has gone the route of selling 20
> operating systems all different in many ways, all similar in many
> ways. A global attack on Windows machines won't affect every
> Microsoft OS and probably won't even touch DOS.
>
> Being that DOS IS a variation of Unix whats the difference? That
> DOS uses a backslash and Unix uses a forward slash?
>
> I'm just being stupid by posting to this message, but I think I have
> a somewhat unobtrusive point to present.
>
> --
> Jim Carlock
> http://www.microcosmotalk.com/
> Post replies to the newsgroup.
>
>
> "kurttrail" <dontemailme@anywhereintheknownuniverse.org> wrote in message
> news:eALvwJ94DHA.1816@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Jupiter Jones [MVP] wrote:
>
> > Kurt;
> > Stay with your facts.
>
> I did, notice that I was quoting myself.
>
> > I never even suggested "one big target of an OS" is the way to go.
>
> You were disputing my arguement that MS's monopoy OS is what is the
biggest
> security hole for the general public by blaming the general public.
>
> > Those are your words and ideas.
>
> Which you were trying to dispute by blaming the victims, rather than the
> delivery system of being locked into one big fat target of a Desktop OS.
>
> > You seem to need to falsely put statements to others in order to
> > support your ideas.
>
> No, I trying to actually get you to confront my ideas, instead of doing
the
> side-step shuffle to protect your Masters.
>
> > To bad you can not support your point on its own merit.
>
> I already have, it's you that have not support any contrary point the
> dimishes my opinion in the slightest bit.
>
> > Furthermore you start to name calling.
>
> What else could you be called when you only answer that most
inconsequential
> part of my post, and leave the meat of it untouched? That's exactly the
> tactics of a troll.
>
> > Name calling is strong evidence that you lack the ability to support
> > your own point of view.
>
> My point has been proved, and only the MicroDeafDumb&Blind can't see it.
> MS's desktop OS monopoly is the biggest security risk for the general
public
> today, because that one giant-assed target can't help from getting hit.
>
> It's a hell of a lot easier to hit one bird with one stone, than two birds
> with one stone. I have common sense on my side, you have only your
> unwavering devotion to MS to back you up.
>
> Thank you!
>
> --
> Peace!
> Kurt
> Self-anointed Moderator
> microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
> http://microscum.com
> "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
> "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"
>
>
> 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.631 / Virus Database: 404 - Release Date: 3/17/2004

Relevant Pages

  • Re: MicroMonopoly aids Terrorism?
    ... Microsoft has gone the route of selling 20 ... >> Microsoft OS and probably won't even touch DOS. ... it's you that have not support any contrary point the ... >> birds with one stone. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web)
  • Re: MicroMonopoly aids Terrorism?
    ... Microsoft has gone the route of selling 20 ... >> Microsoft OS and probably won't even touch DOS. ... it's you that have not support any contrary point the ... >> birds with one stone. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: MicroMonopoly aids Terrorism?
    ... Microsoft has gone the route of selling 20 ... >> Microsoft OS and probably won't even touch DOS. ... it's you that have not support any contrary point the ... >> birds with one stone. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6.browser)
  • Re: MicroMonopoly aids Terrorism?
    ... Microsoft has gone the route of selling 20 ... >> Microsoft OS and probably won't even touch DOS. ... it's you that have not support any contrary point the ... >> birds with one stone. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers)
  • Re: MicroMonopoly aids Terrorism?
    ... Microsoft has gone the route of selling 20 ... >> Microsoft OS and probably won't even touch DOS. ... it's you that have not support any contrary point the ... >> birds with one stone. ...
    (microsoft.public.security)
Loading