Re: Good OpenGL FPS, but low Direct3D FPS with new FX5950 card
From: Chris Catt (notknown_at_ntlworld.com)
Date: 06/19/04
- Next message: Paul Smith: "Re: Window95 game suddenly ends"
- Previous message: Stuart Mackie [MCP, MSP]: "Good OpenGL FPS, but low Direct3D FPS with new FX5950 card"
- In reply to: Stuart Mackie [MCP, MSP]: "Good OpenGL FPS, but low Direct3D FPS with new FX5950 card"
- Next in thread: Stuart Mackie [MCP, MSP]: "Re: Good OpenGL FPS, but low Direct3D FPS with new FX5950 card"
- Reply: Stuart Mackie [MCP, MSP]: "Re: Good OpenGL FPS, but low Direct3D FPS with new FX5950 card"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 15:02:22 +0100
Hi, firstly I can't help you much with your gaming and video card issue
other to recommend this site http://forums.pcper.com/forumdisplay.php?f=50
to be a good place to start. I hope you do find a solution.
Chris C
"Stuart Mackie [MCP, MSP]" <me@--REMOVE_THIS--stu.uk.com> wrote in message
news:%23AXZdVeVEHA.2520@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Hi. I have the system spec below, and as a short term solution I upgraded
> my Ti4600 graphics card to a Gigabyte 5950 U-GT to cope with some of the
> more recent games before upgrading other parts of the system later on.
> After installing a Gigabyte 5950U-GT there was no obvious performance gain
> in the games I'm currently playing which was disappointing (UT2k4,
Americas
> Army, Joint Operations Second Demo). I benchmarked the system with
3DMark03
> and get a score of 6150 with the Gigabyte, and 1400 with the older Ti4600.
> Both scores seem reasonable, and when comparing the 6150 online with other
> similar system specs it is comparable. But, with the Gigabyte card, FPS
can
> fluctuate quite significantly and be as low as 15 up to a maximum of only
> 55. With the Ti4600 running the same game with the same setting using the
> same current Nvidia 56.72 drivers, the FPS seems more stable and
generally
> runs between 25-70 (I'm using FRAPS to get FPS in game). On carrying out
> additional tests I found that slightly older games like Quake 3 would give
> 200+FPS (FPS max limit set at 200) but Direct3D games like UT2k4 would
only
> give 20-45. My initial thoughts were specific to good OpenGL performance
in
> Quake 3 but poor Direct3D performance in everything else, but since
3DMark03
> is purely Direct3D tests (from what I understand). One other thing I've
> noticed is that changing the configuration of a game with the Gigabyte
card
> installed e.g. Americas Army, no matter whether using 16 or 32 bit, or
> 800x600 to 1024x768, the FPS stays in the same low range.
>
> I've installed the system three or four times and carried out tests and
> different points with none - all windows updates, limited hardware
removed,
> different driver revisions etc. But the system performance is still lower
> with the newer Gigabyte card than with the older Ti4600. I've contacted
> Gigabyte but would appreciate any other suggestions.
>
> · Dual Intel P4 2.4 Xeon Prestonia (Hyperthreading Disabled)
> · 1GB RD-RAM (PC 800)
> · Supermicro DCE+ Motherboard
> · Enhance ENS-0252A PSU (520 Watt)
> · 256MB Gigabyte FX5950U-GT
> · Adaptec 2200S Raid Controller
> · 19" IIyama Vision Master Pro 450
> · Intel Pro/100S Server Adaptor
> · Creative Audigy 2 ZS Platinum Pro
> · Creative GigaWorks S750 7.1 Speaker System
> · 16x AOpen DVD-Rom
> · Plextor DVD Writer (PX-708A)
> · Microsoft Internet Keyboard Pro
> · Logitech MX510 Optical Mouse
>
> --
> Thanks for any help,
> Stuart Mackie [MCP, MSP]
>
>
- Next message: Paul Smith: "Re: Window95 game suddenly ends"
- Previous message: Stuart Mackie [MCP, MSP]: "Good OpenGL FPS, but low Direct3D FPS with new FX5950 card"
- In reply to: Stuart Mackie [MCP, MSP]: "Good OpenGL FPS, but low Direct3D FPS with new FX5950 card"
- Next in thread: Stuart Mackie [MCP, MSP]: "Re: Good OpenGL FPS, but low Direct3D FPS with new FX5950 card"
- Reply: Stuart Mackie [MCP, MSP]: "Re: Good OpenGL FPS, but low Direct3D FPS with new FX5950 card"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|