Re: Win32? MFC? .NET? What to use for embedded dev?
- From: "Mike Warren" <miwa-not-this-bit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:10:53 -0800
Henry Markov wrote:
I'm not claiming to be an expert in making these judgments so if
anyone can tell me why I've missed something valuable in the Windows
paradigms I would be a grateful listener.
The only argument I can see is time to market. That's usually the main
reason for going with XPe anyway.
--
-Mike
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Win32? MFC? .NET? What to use for embedded dev?
- From: Henry Markov
- Re: Win32? MFC? .NET? What to use for embedded dev?
- References:
- Re: Win32? MFC? .NET? What to use for embedded dev?
- From: Sean Liming \(eMVP\)
- Re: Win32? MFC? .NET? What to use for embedded dev?
- From: LintMan
- Re: Win32? MFC? .NET? What to use for embedded dev?
- From: Henry Markov
- Re: Win32? MFC? .NET? What to use for embedded dev?
- Prev by Date: Re: Win32? MFC? .NET? What to use for embedded dev?
- Next by Date: Re: Win32? MFC? .NET? What to use for embedded dev?
- Previous by thread: Re: Win32? MFC? .NET? What to use for embedded dev?
- Next by thread: Re: Win32? MFC? .NET? What to use for embedded dev?
- Index(es):
Loading
