Re: ACPI, Standard PC collision
- From: "Albert Gomez" <albertg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:03:40 -0800
KM,
It appears to be the following object:
Component: "Generic CompactPCI CPU board[Version 5.1.2600.1106, R1507]"
requires at least one additional enabled component not in the configuration
After I removed all other ACPI and standard PC objects, the above object
gave me an error requiring the need for the Standard PC object. All the
other components called for ACPI object.
I am currently using a dual boot setup with windows 2000...the windows 2000
device manager uses the ACPI Uniprocessor PC.
Albet
"KM" <konstmor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OGEbVosVHHA.4828@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Albert,
You should analyze (or at least let us know here) what components in your
config are trying to pull in the Standard PC HAL. Some of macro components
(WinLogon macro, etc.) will try to include that HAL unless you clear the
appropriate checkbox on the macro component settings page.
If you target is ACPI one processor PC the ACPI Uniprocessor PC is the
AAHL you'd want to use if you were to leverage the HAL features of the
hardware. It makes sense to switch to Standard PC HAL only in some very
rare cases such as you don't need ACPI features, you want to turn off some
enhanced power management or you want to create an image to target
multiple platforms with different HAL.
--
=========
Regards,
KM
I keep getting the following error:
Error 1106: Multiple active components collision between: "ACPI
Uniprocessor PC [Version 5.1.2600.2180, R2890]" and: "Standard PC
[Version 5.1.2600.2180, R2890]"
I have tried removing the components that require the standard PC object,
but it leads to many more problems. I know the system uses ACPI
Uniprocessor PC object, but have no idea why some components are
requiring the Standard PC object.
Is there an easier way to resolve this issue? It seems to me that the
ACPI Uniprocessor PC object should satisfy any requirements for the
Standard PC object...is this correct?
Albert
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ACPI, Standard PC collision
- From: KM
- Re: ACPI, Standard PC collision
- References:
- ACPI, Standard PC collision
- From: Albert Gomez
- Re: ACPI, Standard PC collision
- From: KM
- ACPI, Standard PC collision
- Prev by Date: Re: Shudown and HORM
- Next by Date: Re: ACPI, Standard PC collision
- Previous by thread: Re: ACPI, Standard PC collision
- Next by thread: Re: ACPI, Standard PC collision
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|