Re: .Net Framework 2.0

Hello Nick and everyone else,

Since this "work around" was posted I created a new XPe image with all the
required components to install the .NET Framework 2.0 via MSI file and we
have been using it to develop and test our product.

Soon we are going into a deployment stage and it would be very important to
have the .NET Framework componentized since our image nearly doubled the size
with all the extra components required to install the .NET 2.0 framework and
it no longer fits in our 512MB compact flash cards.

I was wondering what is the progress on this componentized version of .NET
2.0 Framework.

Thanks,
Marcelo Cortes

"Nick Nehrhood /MSFT/" wrote:

> Hi Pascal-
> We on the XP Embedded team are looking into componentizing the 2.0
> framework. While we continue our investigation I've posted up on the XP
> Embedded Blog ( http://blogs.msdn.com/embedded/default.aspx ) the workaround
> that John mentioned in a macro component format. While I realize that this
> is not the ideal solution you're hoping for I know that this solution will
> work - assuming you can take the footprint hit. Using this workaround (or
> Johns' workaround) you will *not* have the 1.1 framework installed. I think
> he was saying that the 1.1 framework is installable VIA the .NET Teams' MSI
> setup and he speculated that 2.0 can be installed similarly. (and it can)
>
> Anyhow - here's the link to the blog article directly. (
> http://blogs.msdn.com/embedded/archive/2005/11/23/496333.aspx )
>
> Cheers.
>
> --
> Nick Nehrhood
> (Windows Embedded Group)
>
> Embedded team blog: http://blogs.msdn.com/embedded/
> ---
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
> _____________________________________
>
> "Pascal Bouchard" <pascal.bouchard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:uA5FJGF8FHA.3976@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > My principal concern is that since it is for an embedded target, i do not
> > want to have both 1.1 and 2.0 framework at the same time; this means that
> > if i create component for it, i will have to look for all Framework 1.1
> > dependencies from other components and uncheck them.
> >
> > I'd prefer to have the framework 2.0 integrated inside XPe components
> > database.
> >
> > Thank you anyway! (this is a possible workaround)
> >
> > "John Coyne (eMVP)" <jcoyne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:ew8YT8E8FHA.3880@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> XP Pro = XP Embedded... there's not a component yet, but you can
> >> componetize it, or you can add SW install services to your RT and try
> >> installing it flat... if 1.1sp1 works pretty good chance that 2.0 will
> >> too.
> >>
> >> updates issued for XP Pro usually have a lag time before they roll them
> >> to XPE...
> >>
> >> HTH...
> >>
> >> --
> >> John Coyne
> >> eMVP
> >> Windows Embedded Black Belt
> >> Arrow Electronics, OCS division
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> When replying directly to this message remove the NOSPAM_ from the
> >> address
> >> "Pascal Bouchard" <pascal.bouchard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> news:uGdM%239D8FHA.2676@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> Is the .net framework 2.0 available for XP Embedded ?
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Bitter about [Lack of] .Net Framework Deployment
    ... We built a very nice auto-update framework, ... the 30-60 minute range to install. ... Also, the user's perception is reality - and our app install sucks, ... deploying 3.0 application, so I've not paid that close attention. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework)
  • Re: auto install .net framework 2
    ... There are two ways that the framework can be downloaded. ... the other is from the actual MSI file. ... The install location is set to ... "Download prerequisite from component's vendor's web site". ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
  • Re: userName="machine" didnt work
    ... to unregister my 1.1 framework do you? ... ASP.NET and .Net Framework versions installed? ... Neither of them have a user specified in their processModel. ... Did you install ASP.NET from SBS disks? ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • Re: ServiceModelReg fails in installation of WCF
    ... file from a system on which 3.5 framework, ... (those people had to format the whole OS and then install this 3.5 ... securityInformation, SecurityIdentifier owner, SecurityIdentifier ... streamName, Boolean success, Object writeContext, Boolean ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework)
  • Re: building my .exe can it run anywhere?
    ... Then there are those who have a very fast ADSL connection ... I agree that it is probably safe to target framework 2.0 these days. ... At the end of the day, the question is: What is the .Net Framework ... if it is not installed download and install this from the MS website ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vb)