Re: .Net Framework 2.0

Hi Pascal-
We on the XP Embedded team are looking into componentizing the 2.0
framework. While we continue our investigation I've posted up on the XP
Embedded Blog ( http://blogs.msdn.com/embedded/default.aspx ) the workaround
that John mentioned in a macro component format. While I realize that this
is not the ideal solution you're hoping for I know that this solution will
work - assuming you can take the footprint hit. Using this workaround (or
Johns' workaround) you will *not* have the 1.1 framework installed. I think
he was saying that the 1.1 framework is installable VIA the .NET Teams' MSI
setup and he speculated that 2.0 can be installed similarly. (and it can)

Anyhow - here's the link to the blog article directly. (
http://blogs.msdn.com/embedded/archive/2005/11/23/496333.aspx )

Cheers.

--
Nick Nehrhood
(Windows Embedded Group)

Embedded team blog: http://blogs.msdn.com/embedded/
---
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
_____________________________________

"Pascal Bouchard" <pascal.bouchard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uA5FJGF8FHA.3976@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> My principal concern is that since it is for an embedded target, i do not
> want to have both 1.1 and 2.0 framework at the same time; this means that
> if i create component for it, i will have to look for all Framework 1.1
> dependencies from other components and uncheck them.
>
> I'd prefer to have the framework 2.0 integrated inside XPe components
> database.
>
> Thank you anyway! (this is a possible workaround)
>
> "John Coyne (eMVP)" <jcoyne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:ew8YT8E8FHA.3880@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> XP Pro = XP Embedded... there's not a component yet, but you can
>> componetize it, or you can add SW install services to your RT and try
>> installing it flat... if 1.1sp1 works pretty good chance that 2.0 will
>> too.
>>
>> updates issued for XP Pro usually have a lag time before they roll them
>> to XPE...
>>
>> HTH...
>>
>> --
>> John Coyne
>> eMVP
>> Windows Embedded Black Belt
>> Arrow Electronics, OCS division
>>
>>
>>
>> When replying directly to this message remove the NOSPAM_ from the
>> address
>> "Pascal Bouchard" <pascal.bouchard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:uGdM%239D8FHA.2676@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Is the .net framework 2.0 available for XP Embedded ?
>>>
>>
>>
>
>


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Bitter about [Lack of] .Net Framework Deployment
    ... We built a very nice auto-update framework, ... the 30-60 minute range to install. ... Also, the user's perception is reality - and our app install sucks, ... deploying 3.0 application, so I've not paid that close attention. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework)
  • Re: userName="machine" didnt work
    ... to unregister my 1.1 framework do you? ... ASP.NET and .Net Framework versions installed? ... Neither of them have a user specified in their processModel. ... Did you install ASP.NET from SBS disks? ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • Re: ServiceModelReg fails in installation of WCF
    ... file from a system on which 3.5 framework, ... (those people had to format the whole OS and then install this 3.5 ... securityInformation, SecurityIdentifier owner, SecurityIdentifier ... streamName, Boolean success, Object writeContext, Boolean ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework)
  • Re: building my .exe can it run anywhere?
    ... Then there are those who have a very fast ADSL connection ... I agree that it is probably safe to target framework 2.0 these days. ... At the end of the day, the question is: What is the .Net Framework ... if it is not installed download and install this from the MS website ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vb)
  • Re: There is no .NET in Vista Code?
    ... concern at serious flaws we see in the design of the framework. ... I don't remember Joel's rant as asking specific questions but mostly complaints but if the question was "why can't I have a linker" then I gave an answer to that question but I didn't say you would agree. ... As for my immediately jumping to negative conclusion - give me a break - upon reading his article I knew he didn't have a valid point about absolutely needing Microsoft to supply a linker. ... Of course I can't guarantee what may or may not be on someone's machine but I damn well can have my app test and report what's on his machine and make recommendations if they need to install the runtime. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)