Re: Problem with the System Cloning Tool
- From: "KM" <konstmor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:37:18 -0700
Rob,
During the cloning you should see the FBA blue screen with some information on it regarding the system preparation (progress bar
text).
Even if you happen to have the same MAC address on all machines (very unlikely) and the same seed for generator there is a bunch of
other parameters involving in the generating unique SIDs (time, etc.) and I doubt you are going to get 15 machines with the same
names out of 80 (the probability of the same values would probably be very very less).
--
Regards,
KM, BSquare Corp.
PS. By blue screen I don't mean BSOD screen but just a blue screen with some text on it.
> The cmiGenerateComputerName is set to 1, there is an ewf, but prior to
> cloning it is not enabled (this is done via calls to ewfdll.dll and then the
> ewfmgr at a later date). There were no blue screens or anything that looks
> wrong. The names are generated, they just seem be generated the same, also
> this morning I noticed yet another name clash. How is the name generated? Is
> it based on the MAC address, or does it just use the random number generator
> in windows? My concern is that if it uses the windows random number
> generator, then all the machines will have the same seed and the same entropy
> sources, which will never allow a random enough number.
>
> Also, the machine name, how does it work in a remote boot environment, is
> there any kind of arbitration, or does the remote boot manager set them as it
> sends the image out?
>
> Cheers,
> Rob
>
>
> "KM" wrote:
>
> > Rob,
> >
> > Was the cmiGenerateComputerName advanced property of the "System Cloning Tool" component set to "1" in your Configuration?
> > Are you sure those 15 terminals were cloned properly? (did you see the FBA blue screen on the first boot after the cloning)?
> > Do you use EWF and if you do - do you commit after the seal?
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > KM, BSquare Corp.
> >
> > PS. Are you planning on remote booting the 1000 terminals with MS RBS? Please be aware that it only supports unicast TFTP and
> > wouldn't be a good solution for booting > 10 devices (this certainly depends on network environment, capacity, etc.).
> >
> > > I'm using the System Cloning Tool to name my machines, now I seal the image,
> > > clone the drives and put the drives in our terminals. However, on a sample of
> > > only 80 images we've had about 15 network name clashes. Is there a setting
> > > that I have to have change, or is there a top limit that the machines will
> > > safely clone to?
> > >
> > > My concern is that we are toying with the idea of using remote boot systems
> > > that will have in the order of a 1000 units. Will we end up in the situation
> > > where large numbers of our terminals will have name clashes?
> > >
> > > Thanks for any information you might have.
> > > Rob
> > > --
> > > .Net Development Engineer
> > > ECM Systems Ltd
> >
> >
> >
.
- References:
- Problem with the System Cloning Tool
- From: Rob White
- Re: Problem with the System Cloning Tool
- From: KM
- Re: Problem with the System Cloning Tool
- From: Rob White
- Problem with the System Cloning Tool
- Prev by Date: Re: remote desktop slow start on XPE
- Next by Date: Re: Problem with the System Cloning Tool
- Previous by thread: Re: Problem with the System Cloning Tool
- Next by thread: Re: Problem with the System Cloning Tool
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|