Re: Hibernate once - resume many
- From: "Slobodan Brcin \(eMVP\)" <sbrcin@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:02:46 +0200
Konstantin,
Are you sure that it enables the SE_SHUTDOWN_NAME privilege?
I think that this should work on principle if you have enough rights then
you can take SE_SHUTDOWN_NAME as we do when we want to reboot.
If we revoke that rights then you should not be able to associate
SE_SHUTDOWN_NAME right with your process token.
This should be tested or at least analyzed from doc I'm talking here from
head and it is 8:00 AM I'm too much dizzy to thinks straight.
Regards,
Slobodan
"KM" <konstmor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uEt06QbNFHA.3668@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Slobodan,
>
> Although it is a good idea I don't think it is going to work.
> From my investigation it seeemed that that MS Gina code that is
> responsible for the "Turn Off" dialog requests for (enables) the
> SE_SHUTDOWN_NAME privilege for the current user temporarily prior and
> while making the call to NtPowerInformation :-(
>
> I guess this is one more feature to be requested for XPe to make it more
> *embedded*.
>
> Regards,
> Konstantin
>
>> Alex,
>>
>> I have no enough time right now to try to figure this out (test this),
>> but please try following and let us know:
>>
>> Use LsaRemoveAccountRights to revoke SE_SHUTDOWN_NAME privilege for all
>> user accounts including admin accounts except the account which
>> privileges you will use for hibernation.
>> Or after HORM resume you can revoke this right for current user.
>>
>> In registry I think that this info is stored in
>> HKLM\SECURITY\Policy\Accounts\AccountSID.
>>
>> Have fun with this and let us know if you figured this out.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Slobodan
>>
>>
>> "KM" <konstmor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:eGPPsbXNFHA.1476@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Alex,
>>>
>>> Good catch. I'd also love to know how they were thinking to accomplish
>>> that. Unless they talk about a custom shell there where we
>>> create the "shutdown" menu ourselves, I don't know an easy way to remove
>>> the Hibernate/Standby options (buttons) off the Explorer
>>> standard shutdown dialog (more specifically, Winlogon/Gina).
>>>
>>> If you find a way, let us know here. That would be an interesting
>>> finding.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> KM, BSquare Corp.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Thanks for the help, please take a look at the following. In Target
>>>> Designer, please search under Help for "Design Considerations for using
>>>> EWF
>>>> with Hibernation". The second paragraph under the first bullet
>>>> recommends
>>>> removing the Hibernation option from the Shutdown menu. It does not
>>>> say how
>>>> to accomplish this task.
>>>>
>>>> "KM" wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Alec,
>>>> >
>>>> > Yes, it will certainly disable HORM.
>>>> >
>>>> > Unfortunately, the dialog you are asking about is a part of MS Gina.
>>>> > Without replacing the Winlogon's GINA I don't know any easy
>>> and
>>>> > legal way to "change" the button layout on the dialog.
>>>> > The dialog shows the Hibernate and StandBy button querying to
>>>> > NtPowerInformation to check whether the Hibernate and StandBy
>>> features
>>>> > supported. There is no registry control of the button appearance :-(
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Regards,
>>>> > KM, BSquare Corp.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > > Won't that disable my hibernate once - resume many?
>>>> > >
>>>> > > "KM" wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > > Alec,
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Just disable the Hibernation support at run time (power applet,
>>>> > > > IIRC) or in TD Configuration on HAL (PC) component settings
>>>> > page.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > --
>>>> > > > Regards,
>>>> > > > KM, BSquare Corp.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > PS. The post subject sounded confusing and not related to the
>>>> > > > post itself. Let us know if you meant something else.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > > Does anyone know how to remove the hibernate option from the
>>>> > > > > Power Off
>>>> > > > > options window? I only want "Turn Off" and "Restart" as
>>>> > > > > options.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hibernate once - resume many
- From: KM
- Re: Hibernate once - resume many
- References:
- Hibernate once - resume many
- From: Alec C
- Re: Hibernate once - resume many
- From: KM
- Re: Hibernate once - resume many
- From: Alec C
- Re: Hibernate once - resume many
- From: KM
- Re: Hibernate once - resume many
- From: Alex C
- Re: Hibernate once - resume many
- From: KM
- Re: Hibernate once - resume many
- From: Slobodan Brcin \(eMVP\)
- Re: Hibernate once - resume many
- From: KM
- Hibernate once - resume many
- Prev by Date: sharing database
- Next by Date: Booting from created run_time image
- Previous by thread: Re: Hibernate once - resume many
- Next by thread: Re: Hibernate once - resume many
- Index(es):