Re: [Newbie] FBA vs Installations
From: Sören Gessele (soeren.gessele_at_stachlelektronik.de)
Date: 10/26/04
- Next message: Simon Wilton: "Re: XEP with 64 Megs of memory"
- Previous message: Asim Hussnain: "[Newbie] FBA vs Installations"
- In reply to: Asim Hussnain: "[Newbie] FBA vs Installations"
- Next in thread: Slobodan Brcin \(eMVP\): "Re: [Newbie] FBA vs Installations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 08:35:40 +0200
Hi asim,
if you clone a system which already ran through the FBA the SID&Computername
will be at all systems the same. If you
dont use network or something dont care, but its not the finest way ;-)
Best regards,
Sören
"Asim Hussnain" <a@b.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:OXvstLyuEHA.1448@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> I understand that FBA can do some Machine/User-Specific One-Time
> Installation tasks. Consider this case:
> I'm creating a run-time image to be deployed on several similiar machines
> (rather same machines). Lets say that I created this image and then booted
a
> mchine with the image. So the FBA runs. Now my XPE is running on machine.
> I've to integrate many third party applications with the image. To save
> myself trouble of *componentizing* the 3rd party components, I install the
> 3rdParty programs on the running XPE image. Now I take the image (bit by
bit
> snapshot) of the Partition and deploy this onto other machines.
>
> Should doing so work? NO? Why not? Somehow YES? How? Any clues?
> TIA
>
> Asim Hussnain
> IPA
>
>
- Next message: Simon Wilton: "Re: XEP with 64 Megs of memory"
- Previous message: Asim Hussnain: "[Newbie] FBA vs Installations"
- In reply to: Asim Hussnain: "[Newbie] FBA vs Installations"
- Next in thread: Slobodan Brcin \(eMVP\): "Re: [Newbie] FBA vs Installations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
