Re: RegSnap
From: Gordon Smith \(eMVP\) (Gordon.Smith_at_avnet.com)
Date: 02/03/04
- Next message: Landon Cox: "Re: Component for bulk Registry adds"
- Previous message: KM: "Re: boot problem"
- In reply to: KM: "Re: RegSnap"
- Next in thread: Landon Cox: "Re: RegSnap"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 12:55:53 -0700
I guess I should look for an old version somewhere. The new version isn't
quite working correctly. Not all of the keys make it to the .reg file and
few (but some) of the values make it there.
KM wrote:
> Gordon,
>
> I've been using RegSnap v3.1 without problems. The reg files seemed
> to be correct (Undo and Redo).
> What exactly bugs do you see there?
>
> Also, please keep in mind there is a bug in MS CD about importing .reg
> file - loosing spaces in reg key paths. This gets especially hard to
> fix when you have got a bunch of reg keys to integrate in to your
> image.
>
>
>> Has anyone else run into bugs with RegSnap? I downloaded it
>> recently to handle creating a .reg file for an application that adds
>> about 1033 registry keys. The html report generated by RegSnap
>> seems perfectly accurate, but the .reg file created by it doesn't
>> seem to reflect everything in the report.
>>
>> Is it bugged or am I? :-)
>>
>> --
>> Gordon Smith (eMVP)
>> Gordon.Smith@nospam.avnet.com
-- Gordon Smith (eMVP) Gordon.Smith@nospam.avnet.com
- Next message: Landon Cox: "Re: Component for bulk Registry adds"
- Previous message: KM: "Re: boot problem"
- In reply to: KM: "Re: RegSnap"
- Next in thread: Landon Cox: "Re: RegSnap"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|