Re: Hardware Monitor found an error

What I meant by check into it.. was to learn about it.. I don't thinnk you
can fault me there.. I have given up trying to run those floppies because
all it was doing was to stress me out.. and that I don't need.. I am willing
and able to follow most instructions.. but I get lost on some.. I am 69
years of age, and a female, no excuses, because I love to learn.. but I know
my limits.. thanks Rainy


"w_tom" <w_tom1@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:6bf5c978-69a7-412e-a446-2719d3382098@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Apr 8, 3:13 pm, "Rainy" <sweetwr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
... , it has been my intention to buy more ram.. so I will do this.. and
if I have enough money after the move, I can have a tech look at it
and see where the problems lie.., My son is pretty good with hard
ware, but not with windows XP ...
I know what a power supply is but up til now had never heard of a power
supply "system".. so I will check into that.

You don't want to 'check into it' because there is nothing for you
to 'check into'. There is a power supply 'system'. Therefore go
back to that post, do each paragraph, one at a time. Then read the
next paragraph and do it. That power supply 'system'? You will
learn about it by doing what the paragraph says and then reporting
here what was learned - the numbers.

It is a two way street. You do those paragraphs and post results.
Only then do you learn what you did, why, and what the power supply
'system' is. If you don't perform each paragraph, then every reply
says nothing useful to you.

Knowing anything about Windows XP is completely irrelevant. That
will be obvious when you do what each paragraph says. But if each
paragraph is not executed, then you will never understand why Windows
XP is not significant.

Freezing of XP is limited to only some hardware. Disk drive is not
on that list. List includes video processor, sound card, CPU, some
motherboard functions, some memory, and power supply 'system'. That
procedure then starts the process of getting a solution - maybe in
less time than it took to post a single reply. But if each paragraph
is not executed, then you will never understand what hardware is
significant.

Again, buying memory or a new power supply is not a solution. Do
not replace anything until the problem is first identified. Either do
each paragraph posted previously - or take twice as long posting
replies here that don't elicit useful information. Your replies will
only be as useful as the information you post. Until you do those
paragraphs, then your post and its reply will be more like this one -
useless.

That report on Pagefile.sys only confirms you have no resource
problem - which is why the OS does not announce that problem. But
again, you are looking for solution in XP. XP can provide useful
facts which is why the system (event) logs and Device Manager should
have been consulted and reported here. Then do things without Windows
(as posted previously) to actually find the problem.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Comment bubbles vanishing in Word for Windows
    ... When I exchange documents with Windows users (specifically Word ... paragraph entirely, moved the second sentence of the third paragraph and the ... paragraph, the first sentence of the second paragraph, all of the third ... inserting a comment in the same paragraph as one of these two ...
    (microsoft.public.mac.office.word)
  • Re: Hardware Monitor found an error
    ... back to that post, do each paragraph, one at a time. ... learn about it by doing what the paragraph says and then reporting ... Knowing anything about Windows XP is completely irrelevant. ... replies here that don't elicit useful information. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics)
  • Re: Disk Imaging Software ?
    ... my first thought was "what if Windows won't boot and the hard ... That thought translated into a second thought "Windows won't boot, ... that is why I added the last paragraph. ... I have 2 hard drives and want to make an image of drive C: ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)
  • Re: worthless activation
    ... >Second paragraph - usually your own fault. ... >(ignorance of how to properly maintain a Windows computer) and/or just ... that would usually be the fault of the OEM ... >XP without interacting with anyone - you could reinstall and do so every 121 ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers)
  • Re: worthless activation
    ... Second paragraph - usually your own fault. ... While there are bugs in Windows XP - a majority of computer problems ... reinstall of a system should hardly ever be "necessary" - given proper ... that would usually be the fault of the OEM ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers)
Loading